On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:22:26AM -0800, Erik Hovland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Reimar D?ffinger > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:43:14AM -0800, Erik Hovland wrote: > >> Also dealt w/ in the commit in November '11 in my github tree: > >> https://github.com/microe/libdvdnav > > > > What's the point in hoarding such trivial patches for almost a > > year in a repository nobody knows about (it sure isn't on the homepage)? > > I see that larger patches might needs some testing or longer work on > > them, but that is hardly what I'd consider a good use of > > private/development repositories. > > There is no point in hoarding. The only reason most of these > patches have not been committed is b/c of general laziness on > my part. > > I still consider mplayerhq svn to be the canonical place for all libdvdread > and libdvdnav development. So I *pinky-swear* promise to get my tree > pushed into that repository as fast as I can. > > Is it too difficult to try my tree in the meantime?
Although I have back ported everything in your tree over top of 4.2.0 for OpenBSD it would be nice to get everything into the mplayerhq tree and roll a new release so that everyone benefits from the fixes. As it is most OS's will not receive these fixes as they're sitting in a git repo the port/package maintainers do not and should not have to know about. Same goes for libdvdread. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
