On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Erik Hovland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Reimar Döffinger > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:22:26AM -0800, Erik Hovland wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Reimar Döffinger > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:43:14AM -0800, Erik Hovland wrote: > >> >> Also dealt w/ in the commit in November '11 in my github tree: > >> >> https://github.com/microe/libdvdnav > >> > > >> > What's the point in hoarding such trivial patches for almost a > >> > year in a repository nobody knows about (it sure isn't on the homepage)? > >> > I see that larger patches might needs some testing or longer work on > >> > them, but that is hardly what I'd consider a good use of > >> > private/development repositories. > >> > >> There is no point in hoarding. The only reason most of these > >> patches have not been committed is b/c of general laziness on > >> my part. > >> > >> I still consider mplayerhq svn to be the canonical place for all libdvdread > >> and libdvdnav development. So I *pinky-swear* promise to get my tree > >> pushed into that repository as fast as I can. > >> > >> Is it too difficult to try my tree in the meantime? > > > > Fairly, the thing I am "trying" is fixing MPlayer's Coverity scan results, > > integrating your tree is a bit annoying though if you're really > > interested I can give it a try. > > Ah, this makes sense. There are a lot of commits to my repo that > address several coverity defects.
None remain with code from your repository. _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
