On Aug 8, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Highlander II wrote:
having more than 30 userpics. I'd pay $15/yr for 50 or 60 or 100 userpics, because I'd use that, but I don't want to pay $25 a year for 30 userpics, [x] voiceposts and [x] amt of photo storage space, plus all the other pd features that I didn't do anything with, because I *won't* use those.
If I've understood what D said correctly, though, basically you *are* paying that $25 only for your extra userpics, because that's what, of the paid suite, you use. And the reason the price is as low as that is that you *don't* use the voiceposting, whereas another user might use voiceposting a lot and only use a few userpics. In a way, it's a la carte already, with each user choosing which elements to apply her/ his money to, and the finance admins in the background calculating how much the average price of paid-use is. And it works out, across the whole service, because almost no one uses everything.
I may have misunderstood, of course, but that was the shape it sounded like to me. Which would mean that paying only for userpics would be likely to be more expensive than paying for the whole paid- bundle.
Cheers, ER _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
