On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Highlander II <[email protected]> wrote: > re: Community maintainers, etc - > > Wasn't there discussion at one point about having different 'levels' of > maintainers for communities? Like - there's the Comm owner, who can control > everything, then have maintainers who can do things like ban trolls, approve > members and make layout changes, then some sub-maintainers who can only > approve members.
Some online forums have that kind of arrangement. However, there still needs to be a policy for abandoned but active groups, because no amount of making options available will make them always be used--especially in the case of a small group that gradually grows, and the original owner abandons it before it gets large and active, and not until a troll shows up does anyone notice there's a problem. > I thought this was something that had come up previously, which, if handled > this way, would solve a lot of the 'AWOL maintainer' issues. Not all, but > many. > > -- > Highlander II > > Currently reading: "Furies of Calderon" by Jim Butcher > http://www.h2smsk.com > http://hdresdenwizard.h2smsk.com > http://vanhelsing.h2smsk.com/ > http://jamesmarsters.h2smsk.com > > _______________________________________________ > dw-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss > -- "I follow Eris blindly in all things. That She is the Goddess of Chaos simplifies this immensely." -- Christian the Pagan _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
