On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a) > that this is DWM and b) knows that DWM is licensed under MIT? So this > user does not have the freedom to use, study, share and improve the > software.
So now software is only free when each and every distributor is forced to educate his customers about all the wonderful things they are allowed to do with it? This is just another display of your misunderstanding of the concept "freedom". Really, buy a dictionary...
