On 5/20/08, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 18:23:43 +0200]: > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a) > > > that this is DWM and b) knows that DWM is licensed under MIT? So this > > > user does not have the freedom to use, study, share and improve the > > > software. > > > > So now software is only free when each and every distributor is forced > > to educate his customers about all the wonderful things they are > > allowed to do with it? > > > For the record: I did not say that. Software is free, when the user has > the freedom to use, study, share and improve it. > > > > This is just another display of your misunderstanding of the concept > > "freedom". Really, buy a dictionary... > > > Thanks for the advise :)
Yeah, very funny. This is plain ridiculous -- hiro
