Hi Tibor. AFIK #2 is being considered... it might take a while... bugs need to be fixed first.
re #1... I think you should ask Simon to implement that in HRD since his program would create that requirement with any logging program. (Maybe he did... did you ask him?) I use multiple virtual ports as implemented my Microham and that works perfectly. As for DX4Win users switching to HRD logging... not a chance. D4W users use it for a reason... very fast performance and the most accurate award tracking. Did you try Simons' log? It uses Microsoft Jet DB so is SLOOOOOW! Here is an example... On my not so fast hamshack computer to import 25K QSOs... DX4Win (proprietary DB)... about 1 minute. Logic8 (Foxbase)... about 5 minutes. DXLabs (MS Jet)... about 30 minutes. HRD Log (MS Jet)... about 30 minutes DX4Win to open... about 3 seconds HRD Log to open... about 30 seconds... that's a looong time when you are waiting ;-) To be fair... I am sure HRD will get faster... Simon is an amazing programmer... but he can't make the MS Jet DB go any faster... I suspect Microsoft designed it that way to push people to it's SQL server ;) I believe he supports connections to other databases such as mySQL but that is starting to get complicated for the average user. Also, using MS Jet DB does make it much easier to access your data... for example... you have almost unlimited ability to make adjustments or corrections to your log if you are familiar with ACCESS. Nonetheless, you can't beat D4W for speed. Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote: > Ok, i don't know if it is appropriate at this time to make a post like this. > > > > Any way: I would like to ask a pair of things to Paul. > > > > 1) we can understand that CAT is a very complicated matter. Dx4win do > that in a very primitive manner. But. now that dx4win has the band map > should be very interesting to run connected to the radio. Problem is that > many of us are using dedicated CAT software like HRD or, for the TS2000, the > ARCP2000. Many of use have more than 2.3 radio connected. The only way to > run dx4win together with such these software is a com emulator. I tried a > number of them but they show some problem with dx4win. Now, because dx4win > will be not a CAT program but it is simply the best logging software around > should be a nice feature if, dx4win itself provides a virtual com system, > good for itself and good for us running a multitasking system. Should be a > nice touch now that the best cat program around (HRD) is going to implement > a logging software by itself (HRD). Some people should be driven to migrate > from dx4win to HRD log. > > > > 2) This is much more simple. I ham an avid cluster user. All the time > that I connect to my node I do have a number of operations that should be > easy to implement like a macro or something like that. I mean that when I > start dx4win, my log should be connected directly to my node and should > clean all the previous spots in its windows. At the contrary they are all > manual opr. > > > > Holidays are at the end.. Contest season is back to the door and seems that > propagation is going to do a better job than last year. > > 73 and good dx > > > > Tibor, IK2SAI > > ______________________________________________________________ > Dx4win mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
