[e-gold-list] Re: Public Announcement regarding OSGold links

[Viking Coder]

> hmmm, but reading back through your past posts, you are obviously VERY
> biased in your opinions... this leads one to wonder about the vociferous
> disclaimer above... most people wouldn't find such disclaimers necessary.
> (Methinks he doth protest too much!)

Did I ever say I was unbiased?

I'm not most people. I included the vociferous disclaimer to avoid being
hounded by vociferous lawyers with the scent of libel on their noses.


> Especially if it fits into the *scam* category as you suggest. No, it is very
> unlikely that this is the motivation behind e-gold's action. 

It is very likely. However, that is my opinion. I can protest all I want
to. :)


> Even with this action of supposedly distancing themselves, e-gold have not in
> any way prevented themselves from being lumped together with OSgold by the
> media. The media will do it anyway... they are unlikely to even be aware of
>  e-gold's *distancing* policy.

At which point, e-gold can point to this specific action and say
"NAYYHHH... TTHHBBBPPP!!!" or much more probably, something more
diplomatic.


Viking Coder
________________
Worth Two Cents?
http://www.2cw.org/VikingCoder

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]