> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerardo S.
> Esguerra
> >
> > So let's all be careful to compare only apples to apples when
> talking about
> > what's a "realistic" ROI for HYIPs. One where you just send the
> money and
> > get a fantastic return for nothing is certainly a scam; one
> where you have
> > to work is another animal entirely.
> >
>
> Send the money to get something for nothing is "certainly a scam." Well,
> isn't this what you do when you invest in stocks, futures, etc.? ;-)
>
Notice how he tries to make it look like I said something I never actually
said. In logic that's called a straw man: Claim someone has taken a
different, more easily attackable, position than he has actually taken and
attack that position instead of addressing what he actually said.
Firstly, I didn't say "something for nothing." I said "fantastic returns"
for nothing. Secondly, if you read the rest of the post--which you
conveniently snipped so as not to confuse anyone with facts--it is obvious
that by "for nothing" I mean without working.
Sheesh.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
