The Snipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you have pointed out the main weakness is that some or all of the key
> players in each company listed reside or have close connections in the US.
Pecunix has other problems: they specifically aim the MLM/gaming/scam
market (at least in the beginning), thereby introducing a higher risk of
being shut down by the authorities.
> Pecunix Incorporated does not have that disadvantage. The company is
> registered in Panama and NONE of the major players are in the US. In
> fact they are in New Zealand if you read the prospectus. And NZ does
> not have a history of kotowing to the US government. This will only
> increase the security aspect from the user point of view when it comes
> to US governmental agencies.
I wonder what the Panama and NZ governments will do when they figure out
that Pecunix is supporting scams. It's not just the US government that does
not like them, even though most 'victims' seem to live in the US.
Edwin
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
