At 11:11 PM +1000 5/29/03, Ian Green wrote: ... >PS: This got (automatically) rejected (the first time) as containing "at >least one attachment", but it's plain text and has no attachments! ... >Bcc-ing to myself to check for sure.
Lyris has been acting up again (sometimes autorejecting *without* telling the rejectee and never telling me either, regardless) but also a lot of software these days tends to default to html email, instead of the low-bandwidth ascii text old 'net-codgers like me prefer. Who knows what happened in your case, it's just weird/annoying...but I can still trash the blatant scams without the list seeing them! I think the surge in velocity is a result of businesses which used to have to snail thousands of tiny, U$D checks to thousands of folks a month (with many wanting another currency anyway!). Hopefully it's only the beginning. :) I could *retire* on the postage-alone e-gold would save a *variety* of businesses. I'd like a stat on "estimated postage saved by using e-gold," (note about nine kilos of spends of a gram or less today!). I also like your stats-ideas, but I'd like a historical *median* transaction size, as an average can be thrown- off by a few very large or small spends. I don't know if that's going to be possible, though, and stats is already my favorite page! Go 10K accounts!!! I'll give a prize of at least a gram of e-gold to anyone who makes the CSV files Jay posted into pretty-looking graphs somewhere on the web. Thanks. JMR PS Take a look at http://martincam.com/ for babies close to their first flight. Coming soon: Hatching eggs! e-gold donations welcomed. --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
