> Can I see Sealand's constitution please? > Ooops, sorry. I meant, can I see the terms and coditions of listing on > Dbourse? > > Hmmm. Isn't that what I said from the beginning was lacking and you said > wasn't needed?
No, it's fundamentally different. If someone can open a company, and write the contracts by which he will associate with others, then this is fine and good. If some third party writes a 'Securities and Exchange Act' by which everyone is forced to comply, then this is wrong. > I think we both want the same thing. Protect investors against fraud, kick > the living electrons out of scam artists and not interfere with free trade > more than absolutely essential. And with this I'll agree! > The reason I raised the concerns was simply because I felt that once they > were addressed there would be a great platform in place and nobody else > needed to trade elsewhere, making the viability of scam copycat operations > questionable at best. That in itself would give investors protection. > After all, why should they trade on a shady no-name exchange if there was > a large endorsed bourse operating in Sealand? And once a reputable firm establishes its credibility, why would anyone want to go someplace else? :) Sincerely, Craig --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
