On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Mickael Istria <[email protected]> wrote > > > Right, As both the generic editor and LSP4E are targeting the regular > Eclipse IDE and to integrate seamlessly in it -that's for example why we > want to integrate with core.resources-, they're not designed as pure-e4 > because it is not perceived as profitable for developers and adopters. >
Is that RedHats opinion or do you say that in general? If there will ever be a dream of rebuilding Eclipse from the ground then IMHO E4 is a very solid starting point. Isn't making statements about its profitability a self-fulfilling prophecy. > However, any help in making those editors lighter, more reusable, or > leverage more existing e4 or e4-based goodness would be welcome - as long > as it keeps good old extension points and integrates seamlessly in the IDE. > Extension points FTW. E4 can also use them. It makes me wonder what exactly is the IDE? What can be stripped before it loses that title? Cheers, Wim
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
