Farinam,
I now Cc our public ML [email protected] which you accepted to
receive (sorry for length).

I realize that you may not speak for legal problems in the name of ADI
but only for technical ones. So let us know the e-mail of your
colleagues at marketing and legal, so that we can address those specific
issues. Indeed, being developers of GPL software, we work for the
end-users and have to take into account both organizational & technical
details.

We agree with Richard's and FSF's position below because your proposal
is too short-time sighted and insuficient for simple reasons. As you are
trapped with third-parties licenses issues, it's now ADI's turn to
obtain their authorization, just like we did with you.

The [[http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=RequirementsEagleUsbGPL
prerequisites we identified]] to work in good conditions (to be brief :
with acceptable license + documentation) are part of the explanation of
our current difficulties to make the modem work correctly in all cases.

The last time ADI provided some technical details is
[[https://mail.gna.org/public/eagleusb-dev/2004-11/msg00174.html in this
thread of eagleusb-dev ML]], they were useful, though some more
questions remain without answers now needed.

Technical questions are listed at :
http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=DevEagleUsbIII (not all have
[yet] answers) and ADI may give precisions to
http://faq.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=InfoCmvEn 

The following forum-support questions may be related to bad choice of
CMV
http://forum.eagle-usb.org/viewtopic.php?t=3292 [en] In Italy, very low
connection download rate
http://forum.eagle-usb.org/viewtopic.php?t=3298 [en] In Argentina,
problem perhaps related to bad VPI / VCI or CMV, do not know ?
http://forum.eagle-usb.org/viewtopic.php?t=3301 [en] Fast 800 E3 not
supported in Mdk 10.1, newer version needed, method given by support
corresponds to Fast 800 E2T not Fast 800 E3
http://forum.eagle-usb.org/viewtopic.php?t=3302 [fr] driver for Fast 800
not included in RHEL4
http://forum.eagle-usb.org/viewtopic.php?t=3299 [fr] modem stays
initializing with Cegetel ADSL Max, problem with CMV ?

This list of technical questions may reveal a never-ending one depending
on the level of information we are provided : "it's better to teach
someone to use a fishing-rod, than just giving fish whenever he asks".
Being given fishing-rods correspond to an acceptable license, being
taught how to use them corresponds to documentation, just giving fish
may require ADI to involve in our [[http://forum.eagle-usb.org forum
support]] (which you can too, as it's free : I hope you speak French,
Spanish, English. Italian / Polish / German / Russian would be a plus
and there are many other countries concerned :-) ).

Those problems arise since we implemented the undocumented CMV feature
and have already appeared on the ML for some time now. Having short-term
answers is a work-around, not the solution. If you need a dedicated ML
not polluted with all development discussion we can open it, this may be
more focused / filtered.

Have a good week-end, I hope we can work together efficiently next week.
Please, let us know your position by next wednesday or sooner, then
we'll enter details and need answers.
@++
Ben'. aka baud123

---------
Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 14:27 -0400, Richard Stallman a écrit : 
> >  My apologies for the delay in responding; engineering group had to
> >  wait for the legal department's final decision. Unfortunately, the
> >  source code for USB firmware and DSL code cannot be disclosed due
> >  to third party licensing issues.
> 
> That is quite unfortunate, but I am sure that someone will
> work on reverse-engineering them.  In the mean time,
> the Free Software Movement has no choice in how to respond.
> We will urge people to buy other products, not these.

Le mercredi 06 avril 2005 à 11:00 -0400, Farahmand, Farinam a écrit : 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> My apologies for the delay in responding; engineering group had to wait for 
> the legal department's final decision. Unfortunately, the source code for USB 
> firmware and DSL code cannot be disclosed due to third party licensing 
> issues. We all regret the delay caused by this process and are willing to 
> resume our collaboration with EAGLE USB team on any other engineering issues 
> related to ADSL technology. 
> 
> Please forward me any, non-licensing, non-proprietary, DSL related issues and 
> I will be more than happy to get the answer from the engineers in our 
> department.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Farinam
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EagleUsb Team [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 7:23 PM
> To: Farahmand Farinam; Farahmand Rouzbeh; Nicolas RIOU; Ludovic AUROUX
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fwd: Re: [Eagleusb-dev] The omega & the alpha
> 
> 
> Hi,
> Well, you know the reason why we are sending it once again : with no answer 
> for more that 6 months, we still expect to get the source for firmware USB 
> *and* DSP code for eagle-usb driver (USB ADSL modem like Sagem Fast 800 and 
> others with chipset by ADI), either be it under BSD 2-clause or preferably 
> GPL).
> 
> Thanks for answering, we know you've already worked with your legal 
> department (apparently to no avail or any answer), what is your marketing 
> choice to get this driver fully free ?). 
> Should I remind you our position which is at 
> http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=DeveloppementGPL
> we only ask you to enter negociation : either be it GPL or BSD-2clause with 
> source, we are ready to accept. 
> Indeed, our main request would be to get documentation : a new functionality 
> like CMV is *not* that easy to implement without any support from you (either 
> in France, Italy or Spain...). How can we cope with it with no information ? 
> We have one objective in mind : the end user, do you have the same ? 
> If so, "we" may be used as a useful canal to filter your work ??? 
> If not so, we are ready to give out your professional e-mail (not much that : 
> one mail a day, if it goes well... as only 2% users out of 100 have a 
> problem... (be ready though, you may include us in the loop, just for 1st 
> level help as one mail a day may be 15 mails a week if you answer... our 
> forum is open at http://forum.eagle-usb.org and may give you a better place 
> to answer once and for all on specific problems...).
> 
> Well, I just may just cannot understand your current position, as you're 
> selling hardware, please make it clear for me of your decisions not to 
> release driver's source code, I can't see your business at this level (you 
> may have one on the short term, I can't see Sagem accepting it on a 
> decreasing market like USB ADSL modems that get eaten by either full TCP 
> modems (ethernet) or higher throughput (Freebox at 20 MB/s) specific modems. 
> Maybe your marketing departement is ready to earn money when your legal 
> departement  wants to get zero contract (easier for them) ? Make your choice 
> ! Please involve your marketing management who may be more realistic as we 
> are living in a real world, not "all the time* paying end-users (that was 3 
> years ago... please update).
> 
> see below for the long term plan, we are ready to negotiate in order to work 
> cooperatively and as efficiently as possible. 
> BTW would you have an Eagle-Usb IV going ?
> @++
> Ben'. aka baud123
> -------- Message transféré --------
> De: Benoit Audouard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> À: [email protected]
> Objet: Re: [Eagleusb-dev] The omega & the alpha
> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:21:47 +0200
> Re,
> I avoided making the announce yesterday, for fear some of you would not 
> believe it ;-)
> 
> Le vendredi 18 mars 2005 à 23:10 +0100, Frederick Ros a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > So, I'm looking for someone who will take it over (I mean who will 
> > have to take over the kernel part of eagle-usb, as all the 
> > user-space/packaging/management is already handled by a very dedicated 
> > and competent team. Good work boys !)
> 
> Matthieu Castet has accepted the offer to our delight. In the name of all the 
> eagle-usb team, we thank him a lot ! He has already contributed to the driver 
> and even proposed a new version based on usbatm.
> 
> So, the current driver will be maintained both for kernel-2.4 and 
> kernel-2.6.x and will continue to evolve. 
> The new driver ueagle-atm works for kernel-2.6.x only, please give it a try 
> if you're interested : http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=DevEagleUsbATM
> 
> A version 0.1.0 of ueagle-atm should be out very soon now. I propose to open :
> - a new dedicated wiki which would be at http://atm.eagle-usb.org
> - a new project ueagleatm at gna  so that we can have both drivers in 
> parallel (well, there will be a new mailing-list too...). We'll try to use 
> svn instead of cvs which is easier to obtain development snapshots.
> - if anyone has an idea for a new logo, s/he is welcome !
> 
> We think this will be the new driver we'll push to the kernel, if Analog and 
> Sagem want to contribute they can give (again) a look at 
> http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=DeveloppementGPL
> we'd be happy to have some more feedback as we did not understand your 
> "sudden" silence for some time now. We'd really like to obtain a common 
> http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=StatementOfWorkGPL at your conditions 
> if they are reasonnable to us.
> 
> > So .. any volunteers ?
> Well, other can join in as "plus on est de fou, moins ya de riz", for one 
> simple reason at least : learn new things (either be it ADSL, perl, Python, 
> polish / english / italian / spanish...). Furthermore, I've already alerted 
> on the fact that we'll soon all have a Freebox instead of the Sagem Fast 800, 
> so people using other ISP would be greatly needed (did I already ask for help 
> on http://forum.eagle-usb.org ?).
> 
> So long and thanks for all the fish sl33p3r (enjoy !), your omega is followed 
> by a new alpha (driver) as a bonus ;-) The phoenix never perishes in flames...
> 
> So, more on all this later on, feel free to ask any question. @++ Ben'. aka 
> baud123
> 


Reply via email to