> This may be false as I'm not a specialist of GPL... Seems right to me too. And moreover it seems possible that ADI accepts that deal.
> It seems to me though that's the way Xfree86 went : n+1 is non gpl, Xfree86 has never been GPL. It is released under the X or MIT licence which is very similar with the BSD licence. The real story is n was released under the X licence. n+1 was released under a modified X licence which is incompatible with the GPL. > xorg is n' (and now widely used). xorg is released under the X licence (I believe). Pat
