Thank you for the information on the TA1. I always wondered what caused
those.
Pamela LLoyd
-----Original Message-----
From: Boynton, Dennis
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using X12 TA1
I saw a TA1 for the first time just last week. It came in
from a new
trading partner because we had ISA14 set to 1. It appeared
to be generally
useless to us, so we changed ISA14 to 0.
Denny Boynton
Interim EDI Manager
M/A-COM, Inc.
(978) 442-4329
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Divoky [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 11:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using X12 TA1
>
> We have a lot of experienced EDI people here. Who has
ever seen anyone
> ever
> use the TA1?
> I've probably been at 30-40 Fortune 500 sites over the
last five years and
> I've never seen anyone use it.
>
> Jim Divoky
> EC Solutions
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: William J. Kammerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 10:50 AM
> Subject: Re: Using X12 TA1
>
>
> > Patricia Markey, of HICOR (USA) Corporation, asks:
> >
> > Does anyone have a feeling for how many companies use
the X12
> > TA1 interchange level acknowledgment? Who typically
uses it
> > and when? When one is received what does one usually
do with it?
> >
> > Poor, dear Pat. She may as well be asking whether you
put the bridle on
> > before the harness. In this turbo-charged internet
e-conomy, we
> > shouldn't really be worrying about the EDI flotsam of a
bygone era, with
> > its cryptic codes and expensive VANs.
> >
> > I would no sooner own up to knowing anything about this
kind of EDI
> > stuff than to question dialectic materialism, or to
admit belief in the
> > Immaculate Conception, in Honneker's East Germany. But
considering that
> > FORESIGHT's TradeSite/XML B2B Commerce Server does
accommodate legacy
> > EDI, I figured that I'd be able to find someone around
the office who
> > would know what the heck Pat is talking about. I asked
ol' Abe about
> > the TA1. He sidled up, flashed his toothless grin, and
proceeded to tell
> > me about the old days of EDI.
> >
> > Abe wasn't able to tell me exactly how many companies
use the TA1
> > Interchange Acknowledgment segment; I was expecting an
answer like
> > "12498, give or take a few." But he did say it wasn't
used much. Abe
> > said the TA1 is packaged within an ISA-IEA to
acknowledge to a trading
> > partner that an interchange was received from him; it
says nothing
> > about the syntactical correctness of the interchange
(other than the ISA
> > and IEA themselves) - merely that it was received. It's
not used that
> > often because the 997 Functional Acknowledgment is
usually turned around
> > quickly enough. Besides, the 997 response obviously
implies the
> > interchange containing the functional group being
acknowledged was
> > received.
> >
> > Ol' Abe did take issue with Kelly Babcock's comment on
the TA1. She
> > said "the TA1 segment is most commonly used between VANs
at the mailbag
> > level enveloping to help separate the mailbag enveloping
from the
> > interchanges inside the mailbag." Abe thinks she's
confusing the TA1
> > with the ANSI X12 12.56 TA3 mailbag and Interchange
Delivery Notice
> > segment, which is used by VANs to report on the status
of interchanges
> > as they hop from VAN to VAN.
> >
> > To see how many companies require the TA1
acknowledgment, just look at
> > their ISA Interchange headers: the TA1 is returned only
if the ISA14
> > (D.E. I13) Acknowledgment Requested indicator is 1.
This indicator is
> > independent of, and has nothing to do with, whether 997s
are returned;
> > use of 997s is usually up to a trading partner agreement
or convention.
> > There are a few odd situations where the TA1 is the
mandated form of
> > interchange acknowledgment, rather than relying on the
997 to deduce
> > whether an interchange was received.
> >
> > William J. Kammerer
> > FORESIGHT Corp.
> > 4950 Blazer Memorial Pkwy.
> > Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305
> > (614) 791-1600
> >
> > Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/
> > "Commerce for a New World"
> >
> >
=======================================================================
> > To signoff the EDI-L list,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To subscribe,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To contact the list owner:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives at
http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
> >
>
>
=======================================================================
> To signoff the EDI-L list,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To subscribe,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives at
http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at
http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
