I know this is off-subject, but you mentioned smileys...
...and considering the mood of some of the earlier messages, I figured you could use a 
smile or two.
Here's some smiley's for ya!:

(-: User is left handed.

%-) User has been staring at a green screen for 15 hours straight.

:*) User is drunk.

[:] User is a robot.

8-) User is wearing sunglasses.

B:-) Sunglasses on head.

::-) User wears normal glasses.

B-) User wears horn-rimmed glasses.

8:-) User is a little girl.

:-)-8 User is a Big girl.

:-{) User has a mustache.

:-{} User wears lipstick.

{:-) User wears a toupee.

}:-( Toupee in an updraft.

:-[ User is a vampire.

:-E Bucktoothed vampire.

:-F Bucktoothed vampire with one tooth missing.

:-7 User juust made a wry statement.

:-* User just ate something sour.

:-)~ User drools.

:-~) User has a cold.

:'-( User is crying.

:'-) User is so happy, s/he is crying.

:-@ User is screaming.

:-# User wears braces.

:^) User has a broken nose.

:v) User has a broken nose, but it's the other way.

:_) User's nose is sliding off of his face.

:<) User is from an Ivy League School.

:-& User is tongue tied.

=:-) User is a hosehead.

-:-) User is a punk rocker.

-:-( Real punk rockers don't smile.

:=) User has two noses.

+-:-) User is the Pope or holds some other religious office.

`:-) User shaved one of his eyebrows off this morning.

,:-) Same thing...other side.

|-I User is asleep.

|-O User is yawning/snoring.

:-Q User is a smoker.

:-? User smokes a pipe.

O-) Megaton Man On Patrol! (or else, user is a scuba diver)

O :-) User is an angel (at heart, at least).

:-` User spitting out its chewing tobacco.

:-S User just made an incoherent statement.

:-D User is laughing (at you!)

:-X User's lips are sealed.

:-C User is really bummed.

<|-) User is Chinese.

<|-( User is Chinese and doesn't like these kind of jokes.

:-/ User is skeptical.

C=:-) User is a chef.

@= User is pro-nuclear war.

*<:-) User is wearing a Santa Claus Hat.

:-o Uh oh!

(8-o It's Mr. Bill!

*:o) And Bozo the Clown!

3:] Pet smiley.

3:[ Mean Pet smiley.

d8= Your pet beaver is wearing goggles and a hard hat.

E-:-) User is a Ham radio operator.

:-9 User is licking his/her lips.

%-6 User is braindead.

[:-) User is wearing a walkman.

(:I User is an egghead.

<:-I User is a dunce.

K:P User is a little kid with a propeller beenie.

@:-) User is wearing a turban.

:-0 No Yelling! (Quiet Lab)

:-: Mutant smiley; the invisible smiley.

.-) User only has one eye.

,-) Ditto...but he's winking.

X-( User just died.

8 :-) User is a wizard.

-=* :-) User is a TeX wizard.

+++++ This email was sent from the following individual +++++
Dan Tharp, Systems Manager
Morton Welding Co., Inc.
70 Commerce Drive
Morton, IL 61550
Phone: (309) 263-2590, ext. 209
Fax: (309) 263-0862
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Page: http://www.mortonwelding.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Electronic Data Interchange Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Win
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 6:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Computerworld Article - List Tone discussion

I suppose a smiley (or two) in Chris's original post could have saved the
complaints. Too bad there are no emoticons for use in text emails (or at least
that I'm aware of) to express sarcasm or try to be a devil's advocate.

//Win
//SNS

I have to agree that the tone of posts to this list server could use some
improvement.  The example given was relatively mild.  Many posts, on the
other hand, are snide and downright rude.  You should be able to make your
point without being snotty about it.  I suspect there are many subscribers
to this list who hesitate to post a question or comment because they do not
want to be ridiculed.  I would hope that is not the desired outcome.

Brian Herner
Premier Health Exchange

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Beecher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 6:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Computerworld Article - List Tone discussion

Forgive me, I renamed this thread "RE: Computerworld Article - List Tone
discussion"
because I wanted to separate this matter from the actual discussion.

Anyone interested in Alla's discussion please reply here.

For the original discussion, please stick with "RE: Computerworld Article"
thread.  I don't like to see a good thread gone bad...

Thanks,
Anthony B

-----Original Message-----
From: Alla Levkov (05-021) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Computerworld Article

Dear Darrel,

First, I'm not Mr. but Mrs.  Second I'm just a grant
programmer/coordinator/sys admin.  as the majority of EDI people  are.  And
the third, I appreciate the candor and freedom of expression not less then
you all.  The expression of that candor could stand some improvement.

Judging by the responses I've got, I'm not alone in this opinion.

Alla Levkov
Pinkerton Security
tel.    818.380.8892

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Darrell Hughes [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Sent:   Tuesday, May 16, 2000 12:48 PM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: Computerworld Article

With all due respect Mr. Levkov, I appreciate the candor that is continually
expressed on this list.  When every e-bag of wind on the planet is
presenting dog and pony shows to your upper management, pulling out all the
smoke and and all the mirrors they have, and basically putting out blatant
lies through the media rags and presentations, I appreciate when people have
the gumption to say the emperor has no clothes.  Whether they communicate
that in a respectful way or sarcastic doesn't make a bit of difference to
me.  As long as the expletives are kept to a minmum and I see the facts make
it to the light of day occasionally, I feel the discussions are fine.  You
wouldn't happen to be a thin skinned manager, would you Mr. Levkov?

Darrell Hughes

>>> "Alla Levkov (05-021)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/16/00 02:07PM
>>>
I'm a member of several lists, but this one beats to the punch all others by
the level of nastiness!  Could we all be polite and respect each other??  Or
is it that we cannot keep our arrogance and high salaries to ourselves?
As we all know there is place and application for every skill in this world.
Please be polite and respectful!

Alla Levkov
Pinkerton Security
tel.    818.380.8892

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Chris Johnson [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Sent:   Tuesday, May 16, 2000 10:56 AM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: Computerworld Article

Quoted text is from <00b701bfbf4e$c290ff60$120101c1@williamk>, by
William J. Kammerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>What is XML going to do for us in B2B connectivity that EDI wasn't doing
>already?  Not only do you have to reengineer your processes (which you
>always had to do all along to achieve the real benefits of EDI - no
>surprise), but you still have to use a VAN??!!! Help me out here, Doug.
>Am I missing something?

You are confusing content and functionality with 'spin'. This is a
technician's mindset, and explains why you spend time giving useful
advice and information in this list rather than producing management
level visionary statements at a salary at least an order of magnitude
greater than that you currently enjoy.

Regards
Chris  (tipping hat in direction of Ambrose Bierce)
--
Chris Johnson  +44 (0)20 8501 1490 (home)
EDIMatrix Ltd  +44 (0)20 8559 2454 (work)
               +44 (0)20 8559 2497 (fax)
http://www.edimatrix.co.uk <http://www.edimatrix.co.uk>

=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list,  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe,               mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/

(' bٚ[h2('zb޵:,&ޙ 
.n+zb޵:{ZrazX'z[h2Eznr^v+rzƭi0f܆+ryإIb

Reply via email to