Travis > JcPenney- Currently dropping IBM (I know it was acquired by GXS) to only use > GXS. They are sending out letters to try and get their vendors to move to GXS > as > well. While the letter states interconnects are allowed, they discourage the > use > of them- Warning that they will not be responsible for any problems with your > communication. This will most likely get pulled as the wildcard when *any* > problem occurs. (The letter even states chargebacks may be assessed for late > ASNs because of problems or delays with the "interconnect facility".) > > What does everyone think? Would you dismiss this?
JCP chargebacks can be thousands of $$$. I suspect it's a large revenue source for them. It hard to dismiss when they have your goods & money. I've never seen a penalty (yet) due to an interconnect problem... My clients are usually extra careful with JCP, and make sure that they get their 997s for any ASNs sent out. Now that interconnects are allowed, some of my clients are consolidating to a single VAN, which makes things simpler. Earl Wertheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spe-edi.com . Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
