We are implementing logistics integration for an agricultural chemical
manufacturer using CIDX and we want to be as standards-compliant as
possible. We're fine with the message content, but we have been unable
to find an authoritative source on the CIDX envelope and
ReceiptAcknowledgement functional acknowledgements.
It appears that CIDX is leveraging RNIF 1.1, but we would appreciate
confirmation from anyone in the group with actual implementation
experience. We also have a few specific questions:
Are most people implementing the Preamble header and Service header?
It is not clear to us where the schema and schema version is specified
in the RNIF 1.1 envelope. If it is not located in the envelope is it
typically parsed out of the <!DOCTYPE> in the Action Message?
We are striving for imdempotent transactions. Which header is used for
specifying the unique identifier for the business document? The Action
header in the Service header?
Thanks
...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>,
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
