X12 has been around much longer that EDIFACT so it's widely used in the US and 
Canada, where it started. EDIFACT is much younger and underwent the normal 
problems of maturing. But now that they're both just as mature, robust, and 
efficient the question: 'Will EDIFACT replace X12 in the US?' becomes a 
relevant one.
I'd like to answer it with another question: Will Spanish replace English in 
the US?
Like English, X12 is so entrenched in US business culture and systems that it 
would be impossible to replace. Yet, as the rest of the world embrases EDIFACT, 
more and more US companies, specially those dealing with international trade, 
will have to become at least partially bilingual. EDI bilinguism, like any 
other should thus evolve as a natural consequence of influence, usege, and 
need, not mandates.
In fact, this is already happening: the US Customs bureau, most of the large 
automotive and logistics firms, and many others others are using EDIFACT with 
their international trading partners. I know for instance Wal-Mart has been 
using EDIFACT with all of its TPs in Mexico since 1995, when that country 
adopted EDIFACT as their national standard. Is suppose Mexico is not the only 
case either.
That said, it would nice to see more companies in the US experimenting with 
EDIFACT, after all it's developed and promoted by the United Nations for global 
trade and understanding, it's already included in most of the EDI software, and 
best of all it's FREE..
Can't go wrong!
Ricardo Johnson
 
 . However, like Spanish EDIFACT offers many benefits very rapidly a--- On Thu, 
9/4/08, Chill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Chill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [EDI-L] Which do you prefer, X12 or EDIFACT?
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008, 9:34 AM

Just starting this discussion to see which is the preferred EDI format.
I have heard statements from some that "EDIFACT will replace X12 within 
the next 5 years" and "X12 is Superior and EDIFACT is Inferior".
I would like to hear the Pros and Cons of both from some of 
the "Superior Minds" that frequent this group.
As a little background data, we are using Inovis BizManager (Oracle 
Data Base) and the Inovis Mapper product.
We are on a Linux set up using Redhat 4, using Oracle 11i.

Thank you,
Char
859-620-3356



------------------------------------

...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix:
<SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>,
<EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work:
<JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links






      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to