Being the vendor, I prefer that method. Target does that and they are my favorite. The 850 comes in production, it takes may be 10 minutes to set it up because what they said on their spec is exactly what they send. They don't do anything weird or "creative". They send basically exactly what every other big retailer sends so my generic 850 map handled it with no changes. They test the 856 and 810 parallel with production data and the staff there not only are very knowledgeable they are extremely nice. I've tested with them three times as different vendors and the experience is always the same, excellent.
Target is an excellent example of EDI done very well in-house soup to nuts by a big retailer. On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Jason McMahon <[email protected]>wrote: > Then I am in very good company. On the other hand, I have set up new > trading partners who put off testing for weeks so I test with any examples I > can find, only to have a production document come through without any > warning whatsoever. I then have to call to find out what is going on only > to be told that they thought we had completed testing and were ready to go > live. So working directly with the trading partner can have its own > challenges. > > > > One of the nicest compliments I ever received was from Wal-mart who wanted > to use us as a beta site for a new document because we were so conscientious > about resolving issues when they came up. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Jason McMahon > > 8079 Village Drive > > Cincinnati, OH 45242-4315 > > [email protected] > > gutausse.weebly com/articles html > > gutausse.blogspot com > > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jason-mcmahon/11/743/51b > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Samantha Scott [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, March 04, 2011 10:09 AM > *To:* Jason McMahon > *Cc:* Ken Etter; edi list > > *Subject:* Re: [EDI-L] 3rd party testing that wasn't hideous > > > > Yes, Sears is at the top of my list of hideous experiences and it is, or > was, Inovis that did their testing. I don't know if this is who you dealt > with or who they replaced the company you refer to with but my experience > was similar. I had to go through it 3 time for three different "flow paths" > (interpret that to mean 'road to perdition') and each time I filled out the > customer survey as the WORST testing experience EVER. I have to say the > Sears owns much of that credit themselves, the testing company just frosted > the cake. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Jason McMahon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Several years ago I had to test documents with Sears so they arranged for a > third party to do the testing. It was one of the worst testing > organizations I had ever worked with, but to appease Sears I completed > testing with them. When we were done they said they would notify Sears and > Sears would then get back to me. > > A week or so later Sears called me to ask if I had completed testing with > this third party and I said that they were going to inform you that we were > ready to go live. The lady at Sears was so upset after talking with them > that she personally supervised another test and we went live two days later. > > Soon after that Sears fired the company and I only worked with Sears > directly after that. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Jason McMahon > > 8079 Village Drive > > Cincinnati, OH 45242-4315 > > [email protected] > > gutausse.weebly com/articles html > > gutausse.blogspot com > > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jason-mcmahon/11/743/51b > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of > *Ken Etter > *Sent:* Friday, March 04, 2011 9:50 AM > *To:* Samantha Scott; edi list > *Subject:* Re: [EDI-L] 3rd party testing that wasn't hideous > > > > > > Aren't you referring to the "Pay for the abuse" industry, you know those > third > party testing companies...?? > > It is Friday... > > Ken > [email protected] > > ________________________________ > From: Samantha Scott <[email protected]> > To: edi list <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 10:29:02 AM > Subject: [EDI-L] 3rd party testing that wasn't hideous > > > Yes, this is me saying that. You may know how much I personally revile 3rd > party testing as being a waste of money, an abuse of vendors (making us pay > for the customer's EDI program) and frequently a waste of time because they > systems are faulty, give poor results, pass things in testing they reject > in > production, reject things that are correct and are manned by people who > seem > to understand little about the business they serve or more than the most > rudimentary aspects of EDI. > > We were directed to use DirectEDI to test with Veterans Canteen service and > for a change: > I didn't have to pay for the torture (that was truly novel) > Their automated system actually worked all the way through and was correct > (unlike every single other 3rd party test company I've been subjected to) > > It still lacks that communication with the business which is the #1 failing > of all 3rd party relationships but, all in all, I didn't hate it nearly as > much as I usually do. > > Huzzah! > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
