Hi Doug, I think it's the "4" part that's got us giggling. Why not 100? or 105? or 103?
Leah ________________________________ From: Doug Anderson <[email protected]> To: 'Leah Halpin' <[email protected]>; Matt Brown <[email protected]>; [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 11:28 AM Subject: RE: [EDI-L] PO ACK business process question - general Leah My guess would be that the business case submitted to X12 requested 104 occurrences of that loop and it was well documented. No reason to make it >1. It is Friday, but I hope I don't start the >1 discussion again...... Doug Doug Anderson Chair, ASC X12 Transportation Subcommittee Vice President Sales Support Kleinschmidt Inc. 847-405-7457 (Office direct) 847-826-3531 (cell) 847-945-4619 (fax) http://www.kleinschmidt.com/ -----Original Message----- >From: Leah Halpin [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:12 AM >To: Matt Brown; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [EDI-L] PO ACK business process question - general > > >Matt, >Nope, no DTM in ACK loop for this particular TP. I like your suggestion and your confidence. I'm going to go with it. One of the people on this list is/was on an X12 committee, perhaps he knows why the 104? There are 26 standard codes, maybe he only wanted 4 repeats of each code? No, that doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you're right and it was a bit of whimsy. Or maybe it was Friday! > >Thank you. >Leah > >________________________________ >From: Matt Brown <[email protected]> >To: Leah Halpin <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:56 AM >Subject: RE: [EDI-L] PO ACK business process question - general > >Leah, > >Is the DTM in the ACK loop active? > >If so, and assuming the Date Qualifiers are relevant, you could send > >ACK*IC*400*EA >DTM*011*(today) -- or DTM*068*(current schedule ship) -- or DTM*067*(current sch. deliv.) >(or whatever qual/date is applicable) > >ACK*IC*300*EA >DTM*068*next date > >ACK*IC*300*EA >DTM*068*next date > >Otherwise, I would say they expect > >ACK*IC*1000*EA > >and then your three SCHs later in the PO1 loop. > >Matt > >P.S. Yes, that "104" max on the ACK loop has always made me laugh. Whoever was on the X12 committee which set that either had a sense of humor or a VERY SPECIFIC agenda. >________________________________ >Matthew Brown >eBusiness Analyst >eBusiness Standards & Practices >EasyLink Services International Corporation >www.easylink.com > >[email protected] >Direct: 732-658-5419 >Fax: 212-999-7375 > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Leah >Halpin >Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 9:37 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [EDI-L] PO ACK business process question - general > >I'm directing this question to those of you who have retail experience. I am working on an 855 and I've come across something that's new to me. The implementation guideline I'm working with shows the SCH available for use. The SCH at the line item level is not subordinate to the ACK segment. I'm wondering how to acknowledge a PO with multiple changes to the quantity and scheduled date, such as: > >Customer orders 1,000 pieces. I have 400 on hand and I know they want the rest as quickly as I can make them, I can ship 300 later this week and 300 next week. > >ACK is limited to a max repeat of 1, ACK loop (optional) is max repeat 104 (wtf?), only segment allowed within the ACK loop is the MAN segment which is optional and not applicable to my business process. > >ACK01 codes allowed which refer to date or quantity change are: >DR = Item accepted - date rescheduled >IC = Item accepted - Changes made >IQ = Item accepted - quantity changed > >SCH is it's own loop, max repeat 200. > >I am not able, at this time, to ask the customer what they would like (which is what I want to do) so please don't suggest that. > >Should I use the generic ACK01 = IC and then list out my proposed shipping schedule in three SCH segments or should I use two ACK segments one with DR and one with IQ and then list out my three SCH segments or should I skip the ACK all together (which seems odd) and just write my thee SCH segments. > >Thanks for any insight you can offer. > >Leah > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >------------------------------------ > >... >Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> > >Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
