Anyone who has to deal with SPS deserves a 3 day weekend. Bob Scheuermann
---- Jason McMahon <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt, I think you could use a couple of 3 day weekends. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Jason McMahon > > 8079 Village Drive > > Cincinnati, OH 45242-4315 > > <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] > > http://gutausse.weebly.com/articles.html > > <http://gutausse.blogspot.com/> http://gutausse.blogspot.com > > <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jason-mcmahon/11/743/51b> > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jason-mcmahon/11/743/51b > > Note: New E-mail address. > > > > _____ > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt > Brown > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 11:16 AM > To: Leah Halpin; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [EDI-L] PO ACK business process question - general > > > > > > Don't hold it against me if I intuited wrong! > > :) > > Now back to my implementation project where SPS is reporting errors not > evident in the IG they provided us. > > I think I hinted at a new EDI discipline..."EDI Psychic" -- I can just see > the Infomercial... > > TGIF! > > Matt > ________________________________ > Matthew Brown > eBusiness Analyst > eBusiness Standards & Practices > EasyLink Services International Corporation > www.easylink.com > > [email protected] <mailto:mbrown%40easylink.com> > Direct: 732-658-5419 > Fax: 212-999-7375 > > ________________________________ > From: Leah Halpin [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:leahhalpin%40yahoo.com> ] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 11:12 AM > To: Matt Brown; [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] PO ACK business process question - general > > Matt, > Nope, no DTM in ACK loop for this particular TP. I like your suggestion and > your confidence. I'm going to go with it. One of the people on this list > is/was on an X12 committee, perhaps he knows why the 104? There are 26 > standard codes, maybe he only wanted 4 repeats of each code? No, that > doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you're right and it was a bit of whimsy. > Or maybe it was Friday! > Thank you. > Leah > > ________________________________ > From: Matt Brown <[email protected] <mailto:mbrown%40easylink.com> > > To: Leah Halpin <[email protected] <mailto:leahhalpin%40yahoo.com> >; > "[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> " > <[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:56 AM > Subject: RE: [EDI-L] PO ACK business process question - general > > Leah, > > Is the DTM in the ACK loop active? > > If so, and assuming the Date Qualifiers are relevant, you could send > > ACK*IC*400*EA > DTM*011*(today) -- or DTM*068*(current schedule ship) -- or DTM*067*(current > sch. deliv.) > (or whatever qual/date is applicable) > > ACK*IC*300*EA > DTM*068*next date > > ACK*IC*300*EA > DTM*068*next date > > Otherwise, I would say they expect > > ACK*IC*1000*EA > > and then your three SCHs later in the PO1 loop. > > Matt > > P.S. Yes, that "104" max on the ACK loop has always made me laugh. Whoever > was on the X12 committee which set that either had a sense of humor or a > VERY SPECIFIC agenda. > ________________________________ > Matthew Brown > eBusiness Analyst > eBusiness Standards & Practices > EasyLink Services International Corporation > www.easylink.com<http://www.easylink.com> > > [email protected] <mailto:mbrown%40easylink.com> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:mbrown%40easylink.com> > > Direct: 732-658-5419 > Fax: 212-999-7375 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > > [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> >] On Behalf > Of Leah Halpin > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 9:37 AM > To: [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [EDI-L] PO ACK business process question - general > > I'm directing this question to those of you who have retail experience. I am > working on an 855 and I've come across something that's new to me. The > implementation guideline I'm working with shows the SCH available for use. > The SCH at the line item level is not subordinate to the ACK segment. I'm > wondering how to acknowledge a PO with multiple changes to the quantity and > scheduled date, such as: > > Customer orders 1,000 pieces. I have 400 on hand and I know they want the > rest as quickly as I can make them, I can ship 300 later this week and 300 > next week. > > ACK is limited to a max repeat of 1, ACK loop (optional) is max repeat 104 > (wtf?), only segment allowed within the ACK loop is the MAN segment which is > optional and not applicable to my business process. > > ACK01 codes allowed which refer to date or quantity change are: > DR = Item accepted - date rescheduled > IC = Item accepted - Changes made > IQ = Item accepted - quantity changed > > SCH is it's own loop, max repeat 200. > > I am not able, at this time, to ask the customer what they would like (which > is what I want to do) so please don't suggest that. > > Should I use the generic ACK01 = IC and then list out my proposed shipping > schedule in three SCH segments or should I use two ACK segments one with DR > and one with IQ and then list out my three SCH segments or should I skip the > ACK all together (which seems odd) and just write my thee SCH segments. > > Thanks for any insight you can offer. > > Leah > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > ------------------------------------ > > ... > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: > <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> > > Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> > IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
