My pet peeves are: 1. Not being notified by trading partner of a change in contact person and contact point. 2. Being told by SAP implementing partners that they can no longer bundle documents within a single envelope. 3. Tests that are edited files, not something run through partners EDI software. 4. The strongarming by a partner to subscribe to their new VAN and/or enabling company. 5. Being told by partner to ignore the standards and to take the "dirty" data as is. 6. Data Entry people who will not accept that they can't use *s in the data they are entering. 7. XML maps that look like they were the product of 100 chimpanzees at terminals.
From: Scott <[email protected]> I'm interested to get the opinions of this group on those things you find to be most detrimental to EDI implementations. I've posted a survey on eC-BP.com and hope you'll take a couple minutes to provide your views. HERE <http://simplycast.us/fH01> http://simplycast.us/fH01 Thanks in advance for your participation.Scott Koegler [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
