<< EDI-864 REALLY? I don't want to text via EDI.>> Exactly! Go fly a kite with text and N9 message stupidities. Always remember, EDI is machine-to-machine.
Paul From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of jeenias Sent: February-01-13 8:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [EDI-L] Re: Your EDI Pet Peeves (a survey) My favorite is when you have a standing relationship with a trading partner and one day out of the blue you start recieving odd document types from them. EDI-864 REALLY? I don't want to text via EDI. --- In [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> , Leah Halpin wrote: > > You get to pass it on? Lucky you. Once I prove it's not EDI then I have to go learn enough about the system providing the input to tell the user what to change. > > Happy Friday! > Leah > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jason McMahon > To: 'tbergmann1' ; [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 9:50 AM > Subject: RE: [EDI-L] Re: Your EDI Pet Peeves (a survey) > > >  > My favorite: it's not that the trading partner uses EDI, but that they are > an EDI customer. It's my problem first and it is up to me to pass it on if > I cannot fix it. > > Sincerely, > > Jason McMahon > > 10830 Lake Thames Apt A > > Cincinnati, OH 45242-3126 > > gutausse@... > > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jason-mcmahon/11/743/51b> > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jason-mcmahon/11/743/51b > > _____ > > From: [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of > tbergmann1 > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:43 AM > To: [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [EDI-L] Re: Your EDI Pet Peeves (a survey) > > Or whenever anything in the world goes wrong it's "an EDI issue" > > --- In [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> , PCD wrote: > > > > My pet peeves are: > > > > 1. Not being notified by trading partner of a change in contact person and > contact point. > > 2. Being told by SAP implementing partners that they can no longer bundle > documents within a single envelope. > > 3. Tests that are edited files, not something run through partners EDI > software. > > 4. The strongarming by a partner to subscribe to their new VAN and/or > enabling company. > > 5. Being told by partner to ignore the standards and to take the "dirty" > data as is. > > 6. Data Entry people who will not accept that they can't use *s in the > data they are entering. > > 7. XML maps that look like they were the product of 100 chimpanzees at > terminals. > > > > From: Scott > > I'm interested to get the opinions of this group on those things you > > find to be most detrimental to EDI implementations. I've posted a survey > > on eC-BP.com and hope you'll take a couple minutes to provide your > > views. > > HERE http://simplycast.us/fH01 > > Thanks in advance for your participation.Scott Koegler > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
