hi  Chris,

I think I got rid of the 'horrible' errors. Try again ;-)
I really appreciate your feedback.


btw, I recently looked at the ISO 9735-1:2002 standard for edifact
(looking for another issue) and noticed in chapter 9.4:
A data element value containing only space(s) shall not be allowed.
I never noticed this before...

kind regards,
henk-jan ebbers


--- In [email protected], Chris Johnson <christopher.johnson1@...> wrote:
>
> In message <keu1cl+rs6p@...>, eppyebots <eppye.bots@...> 
> writes
> >- all edifact messages since the D93A directory are tested. - should be 
> >a complete edifact message, including UNB/UNZ - checked is against UN 
> >message definitions
> 
> I sent a BookTrade Editeur Invoice to your test service. For each of the 
> line item groups it picked up two faults
> 
> Message nr 1, type INVOICD96AUNEAN008, [F04]: Record "[['UNH'], ['LIN'], 
> ['GIR']]" subfield "C206#1.7402" is mandatory: "{'C206#1.7405': u'LAC', 
> '7297': u'001', 'C206#2.7405': u'LLO', 'C206#2.7402': u'ENPALM', 
> 'BOTSIDnr': u'1', 'C206#3.7405': u'LFN', 'BOTSID': u'GIR', 
> 'C206#3.7402': u'AF/C/ECL/ECL'}".
> 
> Now this is a horrible report line to interpret, but you were objecting 
> to the first 7402 element. The actual segment was:
> 
> GIR+001+ :LAC+ENPALM:LLO+AF/C/ECL/ECL:LFN'
> 
> OK, the branch code was missing, and the converter had been flagged in 
> that circumstance to generate a single blank in the output field; thus 
> breaking the compression rules, but not formally omitting a mandatory 
> field. Had it been GIR+001+:LAC+.... then the report of a mandatory 
> violation would have been justified but for GIR+001+ :LAC+... it 
> strictly speaking should not have been.
> 
> I will admit this is a grey area.
> 
> The second error report was entirely justified:
> 
> Message nr 1, type INVOICD96AUNEAN008, [S04]: Record "[['UNH'], ['LIN'], 
> ['TAX'], ['MOA']]" occurs 2 times, max is 1.
> 
> There were actually two MOA segments even though the EDIFACT 
> specification was for one only. The community requires two, so the 
> converter is told to accept two. Such is life.
> 
> The reports are not easy to interpret, but from that single test it 
> looks as though you are offering a useful service.
> 
> Regards
> Chris
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chris Johnson  mobile:+44 (0)7785 302122 Fax: +44 (0)870 0519 818
> EDI website    http://www.edimatrix.co.uk
> EDIMatrix Ltd  work: 0844 414 6386 or +44 20 8778 1402
> Registered in UK no. 2777624 Reg.Office: 34 Sydenham Rd, London SE26 5QF
>




------------------------------------

...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to