Thanks guys, im a noob but im a quick learner. My CFO is really harping on me to find the cheapest cost solution that we can. I have heard some people say they have been having problems with Sterling ever since they were bought by IBM. Is anyone using IBM now and happy with it? What VANs should I be looking at.
Thanks: "Noob" ________________________________ From: Leah Halpin <[email protected]> To: louis hus <[email protected]>; henk-jan ebbers <[email protected]>; Earl Wertheimer <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:36 PM Subject: Re: [EDI-L] VAN costs question from newbie Hi Louis, First thing, I changed the subject for you so that it will be relevant and you might actually get some responses. Second, Sterling is a great VAN. Third, the VA in VAN means "Value Added". Fourth, you need to decide whether what they, or any other VAN, is offering is truly of value to your company and how much value. Fifth, you can get rates all over the board, but you'd better review point 4 before making a decision. Sixth, the numbers are always made up and flexible, so bargain. Seventh, welcome to the whacky world of EDI. Leah ________________________________ From: louis hus <[email protected]> To: henk-jan ebbers <[email protected]>; Earl Wertheimer <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:31 PM Subject: Re: [EDI-L] edi testrobot for x12? advice asked Hi guys: New EDI admin here. My company is in negotiations for a new deal with Sterling Commerce now IBM. We are offered about 6 cents a kilo character up to 60,000 kc's with overage billed at 8 cents a kc with a two year commitment. We are averaging about 60,000-65,000 kcs a month. Is this a fair price we were offered? What is the real market rate nowadays? Thanks alot: Larry Diantolo ________________________________ From: henk-jan ebbers [email protected]> To: Earl Wertheimer [email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [EDI-L] edi testrobot for x12? advice asked hi Earl, thanks for the clarification! if it is interpreted that way (which seems logical ;-)) there would be no problem! will check some more x12 files, an put the x12 checking on-line this week. kind regards, henk-jan ebbers On 02/19/2013 05:10 PM, Earl Wertheimer wrote: > Henk-Jen, > >> yes, but maybe they got the x12 specs in an official way? > I don't think how we got the specs is important. > > The point is to try to prevent someone from publishing the specs and charging > money for them. > > You can use my links page to see specs for many different companies. > http://spe-edi.com/links.html > > JCPenney didn't ask permission from DISA to publish their own version. > > You are not publishing the specs. You are checking documents to see if they > deviate from the standard. > > You could add specific vendor checking in the future. > Let me know... I can send you all my specs ;-) > > > > >> On 02/19/2013 02:56 PM, Earl Wertheimer wrote: >>> Henk-Jan, >>> >>> Why not? They may object to publishing the specs, but you are not doing >>> that. >>> >>> Liason gives away EDI Notepad. That program formats documents... for free. >>> >>> >>> >>>> to all, >>>> >>>> I would like to do x12 checking with the edi-testrobot >>>> (www.edi-testrobot.com). >>>> >>>> To do that I have to use the x12 transaction definitions. >>>> In my project (http://bots.sourceforge.net) these where donated. (somebody >>>> on the edi-l list, but not via this list ....;-)) >>>> >>>> Advice asked (legal advice): >>>> can I offer the x12 service (for free, online) using these donated >>>> definitions? >>>> How dows DISA look at this? >>>> will they object to this? >>>> or would they encourage this? >>>> >>>> kind regards, >>>> henk-jan ebbers >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> ... >>>> Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: , , , >>>> , , , >>>> >>>> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: IS >>>> REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>>> signature database 8024 (20130218) __________ >>>> >>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>>> >>>> http://www.eset.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Earl Wertheimer >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.spe-edi.com >>> >>> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature >> database 8026 (20130219) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> > Earl Wertheimer > [email protected] > http://www.spe-edi.com > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
