On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 14:27 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 14:58 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > > > Then I gave my R-b to this patch, admitting that I couldn't verify the > > edk2-only customizations against the 1.0.2f release. > > > > Turns out those customizations are indeed no longer correct, so my R-b > > was in error. > > Er, aren't they? Are you referring to my comment about the RT#3955 fix? > > That isn't actually *less* correct than it ever was.
And, embarrassingly, it looks like OpenSSL 1.1 has a fix which looks much more like the one in EDKII_openssl-1.0.2f.patch, than the one in my own tree. Is there room for me to come and crawl under that rock *with* you...? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
