Ha, will let them know. Thanks Abner -----Original Message----- From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:17 PM To: Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <[email protected]> Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeIplPeim: RISC-V arch DxeIpl.
On 13 May 2016 at 04:05, Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ard, > Here is the PE/COFF spec update for RISC-V. Already published. > http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/C/5/9C5B2167-8017-4BAE-9FDE-D599BAC8184A/pecoff_v83.docx. > Thanks. Strangely enough, the filename itself says 'v83' while the doc says v9.3 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 10:35 PM > To: 'Ard Biesheuvel' <[email protected]> > Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeIplPeim: RISC-V arch DxeIpl. > > Hi Ard, > Yes. Microsoft has the definitions of RISC-V machine and relocation types in > PE/COFF spec. The values of RISC-V image and relocation types were provided > by us, so the values are consistent in both code and spec. > In Feb this year, they said the new revision of PE/COFF spec is in the > process of getting published. However, I didn’t get the notice yet. > Thanks > Abner > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 10:06 PM > To: Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <[email protected]> > Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeIplPeim: RISC-V arch DxeIpl. > > On 8 May 2016 at 13:19, Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Jordan, >> The UEFI/PI ECR for RISC-V is ready but not yet send to UEFI for review. I >> have been told to upstream RISC-V code first and then submit the spec. I >> will confirm this again. > > Hello Abner, > > Is the PE/COFF support that you implemented based on the PE/COFF spec? > > Regards, > Ard. _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
