On 16 Mar 2001 20:32:40 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (dennis roberts) wrote: [ ... ] > seems to me when you fold over (say) a t distribution ... you don't have a > t distribution anymore ... mighten you have a chi square if before you fold > it over you square the values? [ ... snip, rest ] You are forgetting? normal z^2 is chi^squared. And t^2 with xxx degrees of freedom, is equal to F(1,xxx) d.f. -- Rich U. http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ =================================================================
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Alan McLean
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Herman Rubin
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Alan McLean
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Rich Ulrich
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Jerry Dallal
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Vit Drga
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Rich Ulrich
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test dennis roberts
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Rich Ulrich
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test dennis roberts
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test RD
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test dennis roberts
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test RD
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test jim clark
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Alan McLean
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Thom Baguley
- Re: One tailed vs. Two tailed test Herman Rubin