"David C. Ullrich" wrote:
>
> But analyzing it this way simply makes no sense. Those
> "trials" you're talking about are _far_ from independent;
> each "trial" is associated with a particular person, and
> there will be a very strong correlation between various
> "trials" for the same person at different hours.
Okay then, how should it be analysed?
Take care,
Paul
All About MS - the latest MS News and Views
http://www.mult-sclerosis.org/
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
