When we focus on estimates of effect sizes and the stability of those estimates, we are delighted to have a huge sample. Don't focus on statistical significance. =========================================================================== This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, less thoughtful people send inappropriate messages. Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in termination of the list. For information about this list, including information about the problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to unsubscribe, please see the web page at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ ===========================================================================
- Sample size: way tooo big? DeLa
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? John Hendrickx
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? SAlbert
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Alan McLean
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Herman Rubin
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? P.G.Hamer
- do we need huge sample sizes? dennis roberts
- Re: do we need huge sample sizes? Donald F. Burrill
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? DeLa
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? P.G.Hamer
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Dale Berger
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Rich Ulrich
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Bob Wheeler
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Robert McGrath
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Eric Bohlman
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Robert Dawson
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Donald F. Burrill
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Andy Gilpin
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Pete Gieser
- Re: Sample size: way tooo big? Rich Ulrich