So, I think your point is well taken ... that is that the process might be a random (that is the roller has NO control over the rolling process) one BUT the outcomes are not necessarily equally likely.
At 09:56 AM 2/27/2004, Peter Flom wrote:
OK, here's one: Isn't this an incorrect use of the term 'random process'? As I understand this thread, what is being doubted is not whether tossing a coin is random, but whether the probability of heads is exactly 0.5. From what I understand of the term (and others here understand these things much better than I; I am a humble data analyst with a PhD in psychometrics, and my math stats is not all that extensive....), saying that it is not a random process would mean that it was under someone's control. Even if some coin came up heads only 40% of the time, it still might be random.
Dennis Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/d/m/dmr/droberts.htm
. . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
