edstat  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: confidence interval q. prad s u
  • Re: confidence interval q. Jay Warner
• is this meaningful or nonsense Will
  • Drawing a lattice Phillip Good
  • Re: is this meaningful or nonsense prad s u
  • Re: is this meaningful or nonsense Rich Ulrich
• Autocorrelation and Kappa D.Rugh (Douglas Rugh)
• Complicated Hypothesis Peter Hai
  • Re: Complicated Hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
  • Re: Complicated Hypothesis Herman Rubin
  • Re: Complicated Hypothesis Glen
  • Re: Complicated Hypothesis Phillip Good
  • Re: Complicated Hypothesis Peter Flom
• statistics help dym0428
  • Re: statistics help Peter Flom
• comparing variance Don
• Continuous versus Dichotomous Dang, Jeff
  • Re: Continuous versus Dichotomous Dale Glaser
  • Re: Continuous versus Dichotomous Bruce Weaver
  • Re: Continuous versus Dichotomous Thom
  • Re: Continuous versus Dichotomous Peter Flom
• standard deviation Ben
  • Re: standard deviation Eric Bohlman
  • Re: standard deviation Herman Rubin
  • Re: standard deviation Peter Flom
• Minimum sample size required... Euh
  • Re: Minimum sample size required... Robert J. MacG. Dawson
  • Re: Minimum sample size required... Jay Warner
  • Re: Minimum sample size required... Phillip Good
  • Re: Minimum sample size required... Jim Snow
  • Re: Minimum sample size required... Euh
  • Re: Minimum sample size required... Rich Ulrich
  • Re: Minimum sample size required... ubikvist
• How to calculate the derivative of matrix w.r.t another matrix? Fred
• applications from nationals of European Union Member States aiia_announcements-admin
• Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test Virgil Stokes
  • Re: Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test Rich Ulrich
  • Re: Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test Phillip Good
• Weighting: resources DeLa
• FINAL CFP: IEEE/WIC/ACM WI-IAT'04 wi-iat
• Run Test : Nonparametric Test of Randomness Mohammad Ehsanul Karim
  • Re: Run Test : Nonparametric Test of Randomness Leonard Lye
  • Re: Run Test : Nonparametric Test of Randomness Phillip Good
• Simple Regression Maja
  • Re: Simple Regression Eric Bohlman
  • Re: Simple Regression Dick Startz
  • Re: Simple Regression Eric Bohlman
  • Re: Simple Regression bw
  • Re: Simple Regression Eric Bohlman
  • Re: Simple Regression Dennis Roberts
  • Re: Simple Regression mgranaas
• Trend Line Equation - how do I interpret it? Jacob Thomas
  • Re: Trend Line Equation - how do I interpret it? Donald Burrill
  • Re: Trend Line Equation - how do I interpret it? Jacob Thomas
  • Re: Trend Line Equation - how do I interpret it? Donald Burrill
  • Re: Trend Line Equation - how do I interpret it? Phillip Good
• EView files (WF1) conversion Virgil Stokes
  • Re: EView files (WF1) conversion Dick Startz
• stat vs. biostat phd programs new student
• Re: sporting hypothesis Peter Flom
  • Re: sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Rich Ulrich
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Shareef Siddeek
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Humberto Barreto
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Shareef Siddeek
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Dennis Roberts
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Duncan Murdoch
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process John Kulig
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Paige Miller
  • Re: sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • Re: sporting hypothesis jim clark
  • Re: sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Paige Miller
  • Re: sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • Re: sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Paige Miller
  • Re: sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • Re: sporting hypothesis kjetil
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Paige Miller
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Paige Miller
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Graham Jones
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Gordon Sande
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Peter Flom
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Dennis Roberts
  • Re: sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Peter Flom
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Peter Flom
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Dennis Roberts
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Rich Ulrich
  • Re: sporting hypothesis John Smith
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Peter Flom
  • Re: sporting hypothesis Peter Flom
  • Re: sporting hypothesis mgranaas
• Re: tossing a coin is not a random process mgranaas
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Peter Flom
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Dennis Roberts
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process Dennis Roberts
  • Re: tossing a coin is not a random process mgranaas
• probability Eddie Jaye
  • Re: probability Bill Jefferys
  • Re: probability Eddie Jaye
  • Re: probability Bill Jefferys
• interpreting standard error of prediction in MLR Rajarshi Guha
  • Re: interpreting standard error of prediction in MLR Paige Miller
  • Re: interpreting standard error of prediction in MLR Rajarshi Guha
• Statistical techniques for the NCAA office pool Tom Adams
• What analysis is required? (and what software do I need?) Robert Chapman
  • Re: What analysis is required? (and what software do I need?) kjetil
• outliners detection SChiu
  • Re: outliners detection Phillip Good
  • Outliners detection SChiu
• online courses: (1) Resampling (2) Reporting statistical results Peter Bruce
• Ranking of biostat programs? ifignow
• Nil means zero Wuensch, Karl L
  • Re: Nil means zero Donald Burrill
  • Learn Statistics Online Phillip Good
• Course***R/Splus Fundamentals and Programming Techniques, March 2004 in San Francisco and Boston Sue Turner
• Bounds on Moments Douglas C.
  • Re: Bounds on Moments Herman Rubin
• Re: null means null mgranaas
• Re: Correlating to look for relationships. Herman Rubin
• Re: Bayesian Class and Math/Stat Teaching Techniques Herman Rubin
  • Re: Bayesian Class and Math/Stat Teaching Techniques Herman Rubin
• question on hypothesis testing burt
  • Re: question on hypothesis testing Dennis Roberts
  • null means null Phillip Good
  • Re: null means null Dennis Roberts
  • Re: null means null Phillip Good
  • Re: null means null Donald Burrill
  • Re: null means null Phillip Good
  • Re: question on hypothesis testing Rich Ulrich
  • Re: question on hypothesis testing Thom
  • Re: question on hypothesis testing Peter Flom
  • Re: question on hypothesis testing Robert J. MacG. Dawson
  • Re: question on hypothesis testing Eric Bohlman
  • Re: question on hypothesis testing Kaplon, Howard
  • Re: question on hypothesis testing mgranaas
• Statistical Consulting Service Bernd Genser
  • statistical consulting service nicolexz
• Questions about linear models Albedo
• Cross-posted as requested: an OLS question chokie
  • Re: Cross-posted as requested: an OLS question Rich Ulrich
  • Re: Cross-posted as requested: an OLS question Phillip Good
  • Re: Cross-posted as requested: an OLS question Donald Burrill
• The design effect Raoul Kamadjeu
  • Re: The design effect Rich Ulrich
  • Re: The design effect D.Rugh (Douglas Rugh)
  • Re: The design effect Jerry Dallal
  • Re: The design effect Malcolm Campbell
  • time series vs frequency domain prad s u
• error rates Tanguma, Jesus
  • Re: error rates Donald Burrill
• What's the computation time of this Gradient optimization method, O(kN) or O(kN^2)? Fred
• error rate types Tanguma, Jesus
  • Re: error rate types Rich Ulrich
  • Re: error rate types Art Kendall
• Analysis of design where subjects only use a selection of treatment Kasper Hornbaek
  • Re: Analysis of design where subjects only use a selection of jim clark
  • Re: Analysis of design where subjects only use a selection of Donald Burrill
  • Re: Analysis of design where subjects only use a selection of treatment Jos Jansen
• Should I be using statistics here? Michael Eglinton
  • Re: Should I be using statistics here? Art Kendall
  • Re: Should I be using statistics here? Art Kendall
  • Re: Should I be using statistics here? Rich Ulrich
  • Re: Should I be using statistics here? Eric Bohlman
• 3 or more competing variables David
  • Re: 3 or more competing variables Ray Koopman
  • Re: 3 or more competing variables David
  • Re: 3 or more competing variables Ray Koopman
  • Re: 3 or more competing variables David
  • Re: 3 or more competing variables Ray Koopman
• JOB: Faculty Position in Data Mining and Statistics Daniel Larose
• counting number of distinct elements in a set Alex
  • Re: counting number of distinct elements in a set Allen McIntosh
• Tests for differences in ordinal data MMMM
  • Re: Tests for differences in ordinal data Donald Burrill
  • Re: Tests for differences in ordinal data Ray Koopman
• The Economist: insignificance economics chokie
• the concept of average Robert Frick
  • Re: the concept of average Dennis Roberts
  • Re: the concept of average Thom
  • Re: the concept of average Art Kendall
  • Re: the concept of average Eric Bohlman
  • Re: the concept of average Robert Frick
  • Re: the concept of average Donald Burrill
  • Re: the concept of average Robert Frick
  • Re: the concept of average Donald Burrill
  • Re: the concept of average Robert Frick
  • Re: the concept of average Eric Bohlman
  • Re: the concept of average Dennis Roberts
  • Re: the concept of average Robert Frick
  • Re: the concept of average Art Kendall
  • Re: the concept of average Art Kendall
  • Re: the concept of average Dennis Roberts
  • Re: the concept of average Donald Burrill
  • Re: the concept of average Radford Neal
  • Re: the concept of average Donald Burrill
  • Re: the concept of average (Don) prad s u

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]