I thought about that option. However, if you are going to use CW input and output, why not just send CW in the first place. CW probably offers better weak signal performance than FSK31. -John KI6WX
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ullrich von Bassewitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 1:52 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: KX1 PSK31? [how about FSK?] > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:35:04PM -0700, John, KI6WX wrote: > > A KX1 could trivially generate a FSK31 signal. Decoding it might require a > > more powerful processor, but is doable. The interesting question is how you > > interface the input and output to the operator. > > Just an idea, and maybe a stupid one: Why not translate the in- and output to > morse? Most KX1 owners are proficient in morse, and it would remove the need > for an external display. Just some more software is needed... > > Regards > > > Uz > > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
