Don't get me wrong Julian, I would make the same choice as you given the circumstances. It's just that the circumstances shouldn't be so. This whole thing with allowing devices that will for sure interfere and then leave it to the affected parties to resolve the problems when the inevitable interference occurs is a copout by regulatory agencies. This is the Part 95 clause in the USA and should never have happened. I am still praising and enjoying my relative freedom of interference. My neighborhood is a moderately densely populated suburban one with above ground utilities but no industrial sites within miles.
AB2TC - Knut Julian, G4ILO wrote: > > <snip> > Believe me, if you have S9+20 interference without one of these devices, > you put up with it. Yep, I've looked inside, build quality is terrible, > SMD devices up on end and the rest of it. Signal path unnecessarily long > pieces of hookup wire from the 259s to the PCB. It's hooked in via the > KXV3 RX connectors so at least the TX signal doesn't go through it. But it > works (and doesn't need much retuning as you change frequency.) 20m would > be unusable without it, so the effect on blocking and IMD performance is > unimportant, the alternative is QRT. Which would you choose? > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Plasma-TV-Noise-any-ideas-on-how-to-filter-it-out-tp5775346p5778505.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
