On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:00 -0400, elecraft-requ...@mailman.qth.net wrote: I agree. The kitbuilding of the K2 was the main reason I went with it and not the K3.
73, David AJ4TF > Message: 23 > Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:47:52 -0500 > From: "Allen Wisbey, W1SBY" <al...@thewisbeys.com> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 lifespan > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Message-ID: <4d8abee8.2050...@thewisbeys.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > On 3/23/2011 10:41 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > > > If you are looking at a K2 fully fitted out with all options, then the > > price may approach the basic K3, and the K3 becomes the better dollar > > value, but if you are looking for a transceiver without all the "bells > > and whistles", a K2 may be your answer. > Don, you missed one important feature/value. The fact that you can say > "I built it myself". > That feature weighed heavily when I chose the (fully loaded) K2. > > 73 de Allen, W1SBY > > > ---------------------------- ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
