I don't. See below...
On Tue, 17 May 2011 13:43:15 -0700, Tim Tucker <ae...@worldwidedx.com> wrote: >I've followed the various discussions on how well the NR/NB works as >compared to other rigs. I've used NR functionality in many different rigs, >as well as just about every after market solution. In my area, the QRM >makes NR/NB absolutely a necessity. > >Part of makes the NR & NB seem "easier" to use in other rigs (like Icoms) is >that the setting is continually variable from least to most. The operator >can tell when he's gotten too aggressive with it to suit his listening style >and can easily back it down. As we all know, the K3 allows you to cycle >through the various levels within an group setting and then you go through >that cycle again with the next group setting (I think I said that correctly >;) ) I like the groups, they kelp me know where I am in the sequence. > >Here's my feature suggestion - For me, it seems that I am often trying to >compare the amount of NR/NB applied between the major groupings. For >example, when I operate SSB (which is most of the time), I may already know >that I want just a little NR based on what I hear, but I want to hear the >difference between 5-1, 6-1,7-1, and 8-1. But I can't do that without >cycling through them all. Also, because I have to go from 5-1 to 5-2, 5-3, >etc. before I get to 6-1, my ears have lost the reference point, which was >5-1. Same thing applies with NB settings. If we could have a menu button >while in DSP adjustment that would rearrange the settings so they cycled >through the groups at the same level setting first, I think it would be very >powerful and very awesome! For the NR, you would need to preserve the >groupings that are intended for CW/digital & voice. As I understand it, >settings 1-1 through 4-4 are intended for CW/digital and 5-1 through 8-4 are >intended for phone? Assuming my previous statement is correct, the new NR >option, when activated would cycle like this: >1-1, 2-1, 3-1, 4-1, 1-2, 2-2, 3-2. 4-2, (etc), 5-1, 6-1, 7-1, 8-1, 5-2, 6-2, >7-2, 8-2, (etc.). I probably don't really understand what you are doing here, but on the surface it seems to me you are asking that the settings be grouped by number instead of a text description. > >The NB could have the same feature. It seems like it would be a fairly >simple firmware feature addition without doing major changes to the actual >NR/NB algorithms and also bridge the differences between an Icom like >implementation and the Elecraft implementation. You should also be able to >switch it easily back and forth between the two options. Does anybody else >like this concept? Being a software developer, I can tell you that what you are asking for is not >a fairly >simple firmware feature addition without doing major changes and frankly I don't think it is a good idea to make a change like you suggest, when the current system works fine. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. > >Tim >AE6LX [snip] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
