This is why I bought an Elecraft.  Good luck getting this type of 
support with IKY.  I would try the mod but since I haven't noticed the 
issue, I don't think it makes sense for me to try.

We were not digging signals out of the mud in J6 except for 160 but 
nobody mentioned any issues.

On 12/4/11 6:50 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The K3's hardware AGC time constant is a compromise between recovery
> time and IMD due to modulation of the loop. C238, on the bottom of the
> RF board near the front, sets this time constant.
>
> We did a little experiment today (thanks to Tree, N6TR) that suggests
> increasing the size of C238 substantially might be a worthy change. In
> the case of signals just large enough to tickle the hardware AGC, the
> first IMD products were reduced by something like 18 dB. This will
> also increase the recovery time for very strong signals, so the jury
> is out on whether this is OK for the average user.
>
> For the experimentally inclined: C238 is easy to get to; just remove
> bottom cover A (the front half). C238 is a large-ish surface mount
> capacitor nestled between two 20-pin connectors. The present value is
> 0.1 uF. Tree tacked a 1-uF cap on top of it. Then he tacked another
> one on, which improved things by another few dB.
>
> Some ops have mentioned problems with signals much lower than this,
> which has always baffled me. But I got to thinking: Suppose you're
> listening to a bunch of S4-S5 signals in your DSP passband. You could
> have larger signals outside the DSP, but inside the crystal filter. Or
> you could have clicks from strong signals that get inside the crystal
> filter but you can't hear because you're using a narrow DSP filter. Or
> you could have noise spikes. Any of these could ping the hardware AGC
> just enough to cause IMD between all of the signals in the passband.
>
> My point is that increasing the loop time constant could have a more
> general benefit when a band is busy and/or noisy.
>
> Let me know if you try this and whether the results are of interest.
> (I live in an RF-free zone, it seems, so I can never recreate the
> problem here. Frustrating!)
>
> 73,
> Wayne
> N6KR
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to