Some interesting information on some of those links!  One of the BIG 
problems we face is what I call the "digital" mindset.  What I mean by this 
is some of the late technology telemetry devices that use something other 
than what used to be called "analog" transmission and reception systems. 
The "digital" engineers don't seem to understand the "analog" RF world and 
the havoc some of the digital devices are causing, especially in increasing 
the background noise levels and EMI levels.

Take just ONE factor like the "CFL" lamps.  A lot of these are operating in 
the 20-60 Khz. region and generating a plethora of harmonics that cannot be 
filtered out!  I have noticed since the wholesale promotion of the CFL, a 
remarkable increase in EMI levels on just the amateur bands.  Most affected 
is 160 meters with lesser effects as the wavelength of the amateur band 
decreases.  (harmonics get weaker as their frequency increases.)  Too many 
of these devices causing EMI seem to be "protected" by FCC Part 15 rules, so 
people who encounter the EMI are left pretty much to their own devices to 
remedy the situation.  In some instances this can be very difficult to 
overcome and remediate.  (I will not go into the problems "Part 15" causes, 
this is a whole NEW and complex discussion in itself.!)

I am sure there is a large degree of irrelevant connection to EMI/random 
noise generation and significant biological damage caused, but there may be 
indeed something to get alarmed about in some instances.  I have no 
expertise in the "biological field" other than various papers I have read, 
some of which seem somewhat far-fetched.

I do know that our LF/MF spectrum has gotten progressively noisier over the 
years especially as the "lower" parts of it are abandoned by the older 
"analog" use of it in communication and navigation technologies.  This 
includes the spectrum from 10 Khz up thru the old shipboard CW and "beacon" 
bands, on thru the AM broadcast band into the "low" HF region to around 3-4 
Mhz.  The HF regions are becoming noisier too but not as intensely as the 
LF/MF regions discussed.   A "classic" example of HF EMI has been already 
extensively discussed relative to the great "BPL" fiasco which the "digital" 
engineers had no real clue as to the intensity of the EMI generated/radiated 
in the HF spectrum.  The "regulators" have forgotten that the radio spectrum 
at least from zero to VHF  frequencies used to be recognized as a "public 
resource" but our "modern" FCC seems to be ignoring that "sermon" they used 
to preach about that issue.

Can we "bottle up" the EMI for the benefit of both LF/MF/HF "analog" users 
of the electromagnetic spectrum generated by the enormous array of 
digital/switching devices so that present and future users of this space 
will still be able to "communicate" AND also not be biologically harmed by 
effects of the newer technology to the "old"?

73,

Sandy Blaize W5TVW

-----Original Message----- 
From: Ron D'Eau Claire
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 3:43 PM
To: 'David Christ' ; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RF radiating appliances

David, that looks like a web page from the folks who wear tinfoil hats to
protect themselves from cell towers. Before cell phones they were waging war
against the pervasive field from our A-C mains power systems.

Many modern appliances radiate a lot of RF energy, but it's not for
communicating. It's noise from their internal switching power supplies or
other logic circuits. It's often a huge headache for Hams operating HF rigs
in the same house.

The electrical power meters here do report wirelessly when the power company
vehicle drives by, but only when interrogated by a transmitter in the power
company reader's vehicle. That saves a lot of labor walking the
neighborhoods reading meters, especially in rural areas. There are other
forms of automatic meter reading in use too. This looks like a good rundown
of that technology:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_meter_reading

If people really see their electrical bills go up, IMHO it's because they
are using more electricity with their new RFI-producing "smart" appliances,
not because of a conspiracy by the power companies. More and more gadgets in
our homes are never fully "off", but keep a logic circuit alive. You know
that's true if it has a remote control, but a number of dishwashers, washing
machines, toasters, stoves, etc., are adopting the same technology, allowing
you to touch a membrane switch or touch screen to start them rather than
throwing a clunky 'mechanical' switch of some sort. They all add up to a
"parasitic" or "phantom" drain that is a growing part of our national
electrical demand and your energy bill. Here's more about that:

http://icrontic.com/article/phantom_power

It's a simple matter to read your own meter to monitor your usage for those
who don't trust the power company.

73, Ron AC7AC


-----Original Message-----
My sister forwarded this link to me.  I think this may be a different
issue than Bill AK5X is experiencing but non-the-less bothersome.

http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?p=4330

Does anyone have any further information on this?

David K0LUM

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4755 - Release Date: 01/20/12 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to