Despite the 120w reference, the poster refers to power levels at 100w and lower in both his comparisons. My experience was exactly the same. My post was refering to the 5000 - K3 comparison.
On 22/06/2012 22:51, Wayne Burdick wrote: > That's a pretty old posting, Adrian. We long ago restricted max power > to 110 W in firmware, and the radio is specified at 100 W. Using the > recommended supply voltage (14 V) at the recommended power level (100 > W) there should be no difference between the K3 and other nominal-12 V > transceivers. > > Note that the difference between 110 and 100 W is only 0.4 dB, so I > suggest sticking with 100 W. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > > On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Adrian wrote: > >> Also see >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/elecraft@mailman.qth.net/msg70785.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
