No, but many are, or aspire to be, Engineers and prefer correct engineering terminology. This is so much more useful than the propagation of ancient " Ham Law" or god forbid, CB nonesense. I vote for pedantry...
73, F5VJC On 25 April 2014 23:12, Scott Manthe <scott.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since the vast majority of radio amateurs are not engineers is it possible > that it is preferable to use the terms that amateurs are familiar with in > the way that they are familiar with, rather than the "correct" engineering > terms? > > 73, > Scott, N9AA > > > > On 4/25/14 5:01 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Jim IS correct though and it would be preferable to use the correct term >> rather than those that are bandied around in conversations we hear on air >> often. >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to foxfive....@gmail.com > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
