Oh I agree on that too. The typical JT-65 or JT-9 QSO takes a long time
like 5 to 7 minutes or more under good conditions. But the software /
mode will dig signals out of the noise one can't hear by ear.
I do encourage one to get their CAT interface working correctly with the
software. Makes life so much easier.
73
Bob, K4TAX
On 11/19/2015 7:32 PM, Peter Pauly wrote:
For James:
I don't see as much JT9 as I do JT65, but JT9 works better for weaker
signals (even weaker than JT65) so you can work stations that are
farther away or under worse conditions.
JT65/JT9 is like shooting fish in a barrel (it's easy to make a lot of
distant contacts).
I also have to confess that it's so slow, I usually do something else
while I'm making QSO's.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
