The CWops group has a program [CW of course] called "QTX" where you keep track of and report the number of QSO's you've had each month that lasted over 20 mins.  There's also a mini-QTX category for >10 min QSO's.  When I first decided to participate, I was limited pretty much by available QSO's.  Now, I'm much more limited by available time to participate.  Tiny resurgence in the Art of the Rag Chew?

Competition is a motivator for many young non-hams.  #3 grandson once came in while I was in a CW NAQP and asked me what I was doing.  I told him it was a contest, and his first response was, "Cool!  How do you win?"  They all carry the "magic of radio" in a pocket in their cargo shorts.  What you can do with a ham radio that you can't do with a cell phone or iPad may be of more interest to them that the radio itself.

73,
Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW
Sparks NV DM09dn
Washoe County

On 12/22/2019 8:37 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
I think we need to be focusing on the personal aspect of one on one communications with someone who we have never met - without the need for the internet, Facebook or any other internet app. It is a thrill to me to be able to have a conversation with someone new via ham radio.

Of course, even that element is fading out in ham radio with the emphasis on quick DX contacts or contest points.  Ragchewing with someone new to get to know something about them personally or their location is what gives me the thrill of ham radio.  So sad to see that element being diminished.

Bring ragchewing back, and I am not talking about the nets on 80 and 40 meters, it is reaching out to someone new and telling a bit about ourselves and getting the same in return.

73,
Don W3FPR


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to