I operated SSB and CW about 50/50 in Field Day this year. Logging
program was v9.x of CT, however I normally use N1MM Logger. Other than
not being familiar with some of the commands and some of the nice things
I'm used to with N1MM Logger, CT, although quite basic (this was the DOS
version, not sure if there is a Windoze version of CT), seemed to work
okay. When I took over the controls I noticed the previous operator
had labels on the keyboard to make things very well understood what each
function key would do (although I still didn't know how to go back and
edit a QSO if necessary, but normal operating was easy). They also had
Bencher paddles and an MFJ memory keyer connected in parallel with the
serial (or LPT) port keying to the K2. I could easily slow down from
the initial 24 WPM using Alt-F9 or speed up a bit for some faster ops
using Alt-F10, but I think only once I heard a station that I needed to
slow down to about 16 WPM, I generally ran at a nice comfortable 20 WPM,
sometimes 22. It seemed most operators that came back to my CQ matched
my speed pretty well. When I was searching & pouncing I noticed most
operators were within a few WPM of about 22 WPM fairly consistently,
with a couple running probably around 30 WPM. I did find it easy &
quick to adjust the WPM using ALT-F9/F10.
However, I found it much harder to adjust things due to my unfamiliarity
of the MFJ keyer. There was a speed knob on it but it didn't seem to
have any affect. I forget the model number/name of the keyer, but it
has a matrix of functions, selecting maybe 4 or 5 levels down and I
think 5 across for various functions. I found I couldn't send at all
(even though the first thing I sent initially was TEST de W3GS and was
able to send that okay), but trying to send things "iambically" didn't
work, such as "CQ". I guess the previous operator preferred a single
lever paddle, even though it was his Bencher paddles. Once I turned
Iambic "ON" and then set it for either type A or B, I forget which, but
it is the one I'm used to and the one that works for me, I was in
business, but I still don't know why there is a speed knob on the keyer
that didn't seem to work at all, and at 2 AM I wasn't about to fuddle
through other menus on the front panel to try to set the speed when the
knob should just work.
I had fun anyway, though and hope to do more CW in FD next year. This
past year of operating almost exclusively CW brought back the code to
nearly the proficiency I once had in my "youth" as a teenager and
20-something. Now, almost double that age & too many distractions in
life I'm happy to plod along anywhere from 16 to 25 WPM.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember reading the results of a poll on K3WWP's website that indicated
about 1/3 of cw folks used keyboards. I wonder if during contests if you may
have a higher percentage on keyboard making it a bit more difficult to slow
down (change settings) for the slower operators?
I sort of like my CW drawl and probably won't change much in the next few
years. But are many of you changing to keyboards?
Alan KB7MBI
Woodinville, WA
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
