Hi Paul: 

The test on one band isn't valid on other bands because the band QRN changes
a great deal with frequency. The fact that you hear little or not change in
background QRN when you remove the antenna on 10 meters with the
preamplifier off is because the K2 is optimized for maximum sensitivity and
greatest dynamic range across the HF spectrum. 

The sensitivity of a receiver - its ability to hear weak signals - is a
function of the bandwidth of the receiver, the overall gain of the receiver
and the amount of internal noise generated in the receiver. Most receivers,
including the K2, have more than enough overall gain, so the things to look
at are the bandwidth and internal noise generated in the receiver. 

Narrower bandwidths make a band sound "quieter" because they filter out
noise as well as signals on adjacent frequencies. The most rigorous test is
to check the receiver at the narrowest bandwidth you'll use. (That's why a
weak CW signal is easier to copy than an equally weak SSB signal. The SSB
signal requires a wider bandwidth at the receiver, so more noise comes
through that reduces the signal-to-noise ratio.) 

The internal noise in a receiver is a concern only when it competes with a
weak signal being received. Of course, in order to hear the weak signal on
any receiver the signal must be strong enough to be heard over the band
noise - the background QRN - being received along with the signal. If, when
you connect the antenna, you hear the background noise increase you can be
sure your ability to hear signals is limited by the unavoidable background
QRN and not the receiver. 

On the higher-frequency bands, typically 14 MHz and up, the background QRN
may be low enough that the internal noise in the receiver might mask weaker
signals. You sense when that's happening when you disconnect the antenna
while listening to the background noise and the noise level does not change!
The K2's preamplifier is a low-noise amplifier that boosts incoming signals
so they easily over-ride the internal noise. In order to do this, the
preamplifier must be placed at the input to the receiver, ahead of the I.F.
filters, so it amplifies not only the desired signal but signals over a wide
range of frequencies around it as well.  

On the lower frequencies, too much "front end" gain (ahead of the I.F.
filters) such as provided by the preamplifier can lead to overloading of the
receiver by extremely strong signals outside of the passband. So the K2's
preamplifier can be turned off when it's not needed. That results in a
receiver that has the low noise figure needed for the higher frequencies and
optimum strong signal handling capability on the lower frequencies. 

While your test is a good quick check to see if the receiver is limiting
your ability to hear weak signals, a more meaningful test for comparing
receivers is to measure their signal-to-noise plus noise and minimum
discernable signal (MDS) levels. Normally such measurements require some
rather costly test equipment. However, Elecraft created a simple test
oscillator that you can use to measure the signal-to-noise plus noise ratio
at 1 uV and, based on that, you can estimate the MDS with good accuracy. It
works with any receiver covering 80, 40 or 20 meters. The oscillator
produces accurate crystal-controlled outputs on the three bands.

It can also be used to calibrate your K2's S-meter and do other tests. Check
out the XG2 Three Band Receiver Test Oscillator/S-Meter Calibrator on the
Elecraft web site at:

http://www.elecraft.com/mini_module_kits/mini_modules.htm

It's the second-to-last item on the page.

Ron AC7AC



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Del Negro
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:11 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K2 receive sensitivity


Hi to all on the reflector.  I'd like to put something out here and see 
if others experience the same thing or if I possibly have a problem with 
my K2 sn5834.  Someone (I don't remember who) mentioned that a great way 
to test receive sensitivity is to simply check for an increase in noise 
level when switching from a dummy load to a resonant antenna on a dead 
band (like 10m is lately), and I am a great believer in that method.  I 
have used it for years with various commercial and homebrew rigs. So here's
the deal.  K2 set for 10 meters, preamp off, antenna is 
resonant wire (and also used a beam). When switching between dummy load 
and antenna, there is no (or barely perceptible) change in receiver 
noise output.  With the preamp on, the change is noticeable, as the 
noise increases both with dummy load and antenna connected.  What I'm 
concerned about is the preamp off situation, as all other receivers I 
have tested do show a marked change in receiver noise when doing this test.
I have already set the agc threshold so that there is no reduction in 
band noise when turning agc on and off.  Band pass filter alignment was 
done with a minimum signal from a signal generator and IF and filter 
alignments were done with  Spectrogram and everything seemed to check 
out OK.  BTW, the I used two antennas for this test, a 3 el tribander at 
40 ft and a OCF dipole cut for 160 and tuned with ATU. 
Do others have the same or similar results with this test?  I'd really 
like to know if my K2 is behaving normally or I have a problem.  BTW, 
the results improve as you lower the frequency, but the first band that 
shows a really marked increase in noise level with this test is 17m. 
Any and all comments are appreciated.
73, Paul, N2PD
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to