Hi Steve,
The audio from the rig is analog. I have just said there is one connection 
to the computer but sure there are several lines going from Microkeyer to 
the Radio (sound, ptt,cw,cat). Still there are other advantages like the 
ability to create Y connection to the CAT of the trx similar to LP-bridge.

73, Igor UA9CDC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Ellington" <n...@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9...@gmail.com>; <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 vs. Icom IC-7600


> Errr...How do U get the audio from the rig to that microhammicrokeyertwo 
> Igor om?
> Steve Ellington
> n...@carolina.rr.com
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9...@gmail.com>
> To: "Steve Ellington" <n...@carolina.rr.com>; <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 vs. Icom IC-7600
>
>
>> That feature can be had on almost any radio, K3 included. I have got 
>> Microham MicrokeyerII and now I can do with just one USB connection to 
>> computer. That includes audio, CAT, PTT,CW,FSK. In addition Microkeyer 
>> has winkey built in and PTT sequencer to deal with external RX and TX 
>> amps.
>>
>> 73, Igor UA9CDC
>>
>>> No doubt the K3 performs better but there is one feature on the 7600 
>>> that is
>>> nice, the USB port. You can run digital modes from the pc with only one 
>>> USB
>>> cable which handles serial commands plus audio in/out. The sound card
>>> connection is no longer needed. Several users are running MixW in this
>>> fashion.
>>>
>>> Steve Ellington
>>> n...@carolina.rr.com
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Dave G4AON" <elecr...@astromag.co.uk>
>>> To: <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:48 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 vs. Icom IC-7600
>>>
>>>
>>>> The IC7600 was reviewed by Peter Hart, G3SJX, in June's RSGB RadCom. 
>>>> The
>>>> receiver performance is mediocre, only at 50 KHz signal spacing does 
>>>> the
>>>> 7600 have 104 dB of dynamic range. At 3 KHz spacing it was noise
>>>> limited, at 5 KHz spacing Peter squeezed 87 dB by using the 15 KHz
>>>> roofing filter, but was noise limited with the 6 or 3 KHz roofing 
>>>> filters.
>>>>
>>>> The review is currently available to RSGB members via the RSGB web 
>>>> site.
>>>> Please don't ask me to send anyone a copy.
>>>>
>>>> 73 Dave, G4AON
>>>> =========================
>>>> Universal radio lists the radio as having
>>>> "104dB dynamic range and +30dbm 3rd order intercept point ".
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it will soon make the top of Sherwood's list.
>>>>
>>>> However, I do not see any mention of "diversity receive".
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
> 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to