Hi Lyle,

Having the HI RFI detection and warning message is great.  If I ever  
saw it, my first reaction would be to turn the K3 off.  Does turning  
the rig off provide any more protection from the high RF levels than  
what the built-in protection circuits do when operating?

The next thing I would do is look in the manual index for "HI RFI".   
In rev D2 of the manual, there's no index entry for that.  (There is  
an entry for "RFI detection", but not for "HI RFI").  Given that  
immediate action should be taken to prevent damage to the rig, it  
might be good to have an index entry for the message for quick access.

73
--
Joe KB8AP


On Jun 30, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Lyle Johnson wrote:

> Hello Lee!
>
> The HI RFI message is informing you that there is a problem in the
> station which is resulting in potentially damaging levels of RF being
> applied to the K3 receiver.
>
> This could be due to another transmitting radio's antenna(s) being too
> close, someone accidentally connecting their transmitter to the K3's
> feedline and keying that transmitter, or any number of other  
> possibilities.
>
> It does not necessarily mean "The K3 front end is damaged and needs to
> be repaired."  It only means it was subjected to dangerous levels of  
> RF.
> It may or may not have sustained damage.
>
> What does need to be done, and done immediately, is to ensure that the
> problem causing the excessive RF be remedied.  Step one is probably to
> disconnect the feedline from the K3.  The reason for the excessive RF
> needs to be identified and appropriate remedial action(s) taken.   
> Then,
> the radio needs to be evaluated to see if it has been damaged.
>
> Often, the cause for this symptom comes down to station engineering.
> Sometimes, it is the result of a failure of a system component, or
> incorrect operation of the station.
>
> Some Field Day sites are complex, with multiple transmitters and
> antennas operating on various bands simultaneously.  The more complex
> the station, the more important it becomes that careful system
> engineering be performed.
>
> We'll review the manual to see if we can improve the description of  
> the
> error message so the person seeing it and referring to the manual can
> better understand what it means.
>
> 73,
>
> Lyle KK7P
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to