KK7P wrote: > >> May I ask why the LF response improvement was confined to headphones >> only? > > The speaker system has its own amplifier and already has excellent low > frequency response. > > The headphones have their own amplifier and had 10 uF output caps, now > changed > to 100 uF. > > Line out also has its own amplifier and output network. > > Note that these are the electrical paths. The firmware LF improvement > applies > to *all* paths: headphones, speakers and line out. > >
Is there any difference between the official modifications and this one: http://ur5lam.jimdo.com/elecraft-k3-mod-s-page/ ? I find it a bit difficult to see exactly what the unofficial mods are as it isn't entirely clear what components / boards are affected from the photographs. I can't really justify the cost of replacing the DSP board given that I don't think there is much wrong with the K3 audio at the moment. But I have a big bag of assorted electrolytic capacitors sitting in my junk box. ----- Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222. * G4ILO's Shack - http://www.g4ilo.com * KComm - http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html * KTune - http://www.g4ilo.com/ktune.html -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/K3-Rev-C-DSP-with-Low-Freq-Enhancement-ship-date-info-New-swap-out-option-on-parts-order-page-tp3789876p3801447.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
