In order to have reasonable articulation, the CM-500 needs at least 3dB (closer to 6dB) per octave of boost above 800 Hz and requires 6dB per octave of cut below 400 Hz in order to avoid being "boomy" or "muddy."
It should never be necessary to use that much EQ to make a microphone "sound good" and is a symptom of a poorly designed capsule (or preamp). 73, ... Joe, W4TV > -----Original Message----- > From: Hector Padron [mailto:ad4c2...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 4:51 PM > To: W4TVJoe Subich > Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 > > > "lacking in high frequency response necessary for articulation"? > > I totally disagree with that statement,it has more highs than > enough,in fact it covers the whole spectrum from 100 to > 4000hz on the K3,I can make it sound as high as a HC5 or even > the HC4,in regards to the "lows" simply cut them down with > the TX EQ,in fact you can make it sound ANY WAY you want it to sound. > > AD4C > > > > > "For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" > > --- On Thu, 4/1/10, Joe Subich, W4TV <li...@subich.com> wrote: > > > From: Joe Subich, W4TV <li...@subich.com> > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 > To: "'Hector Padron'" <ad4c2...@yahoo.com> > Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Date: Thursday, April 1, 2010, 2:23 PM > > > > The CM-500 is a very good headset for the money but the > microphone has far too many lows and is lacking in high > frequency response necessary for articulation. While it > is possible to fix the problem with the TX EQ it should > not be necessary to do so. > > Unfortunately, I lost the HC-5 in my 25 year old ProSet > this past weekend and given the price/availability of > replacement elements and other parts, I'll probably have > to replace the entire ProSet rather than just the HC5 and > and housing. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Hector Padron > > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:11 AM > > To: David M. Elliott > > Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 > > > > > > Well I consider a waste of money to buy the Heil one,unless > > as you said it be the new HC6. For half the price or less > > depending on which store you get it,the Yamaha CM-500 is a > > better choise,either the headphones and the mic has a wider > > audio response and likewise the K3 will be able to equalize > > the TX audio as the operator wanted to sound. My two cents. > > > > AD4C > > > > > > > > "For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" > > > > --- On Thu, 4/1/10, David M. Elliott > <immondi...@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > > > From: David M. Elliott <immondi...@earthlink.net> > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 > > To: "Robert 'RC' Conley" <rc.kc...@gmail.com> > > Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > Date: Thursday, April 1, 2010, 3:53 AM > > > > > > Depends on what you want to sound like. HC4 is very narrow. > > In my opinion, it is lousy under any circumstances. HC5 is > > less so but still very narrow. The new HC6 gives very good > > almost HI FI results with the K3. I have tried them all with > > the K3 and that is my opinion. If you use the wide band HC6, > > you can use the equalizer on the K3 to match either the HC4 or HC5. > > > > 73 de W6BK > > > > On Mar 31, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Robert 'RC' Conley wrote: > > > > > I'm about to purchase a Heil Proset to use with my K3. > Which "AD-1" > > > will I need......??? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
